• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD on the road to recovery.

Hard to believe considering the position Amd were in a few years back, Intel were yukking it up thinking amd were doomed, half assing it on cpu performance whilst the board were busy snorting coke off hookers posteriors, and look at where we are now.

Lazy Intel and their pitiful CPU enhancements really bit them in the a**, still doing the same sort of sneaky, greedy tactic with their 1 gen and done MOBO's...

:D
 
Last edited:
Lazy Intel and their pitiful CPU enhancements really bit them in the a**, still doing the same sort of sneaky, greedy tactic with their 1 gen and done MOBO's...

:D

And they came off with that crack a while ago "amd are now in the rear view mirror and never again will they be in the windshield" whilst still not being able to offer a cpu like epyc. They must have a different comprehension of lagging behind in areas than the rest of the planet.
 
Last edited:
And they came off with that crack a while ago "amd are now in the rear view mirror and never again will they be in the windshield" whilst still not being able to offer a cpu like epyc. They must have a different comprehension of lagging behind in areas than the rest of the planet.

Intel's own investors told him to walk that back because it was blatantly not true, and so he did, because its not a good look for the CEO to be so far out of touch with reality.
 
Intel's own investors told him to walk that back because it was blatantly not true, and so he did, because its not a good look for the CEO to be so far out of touch with reality.

Well the "walk back" isn't as out there as the initial statement which got peoples attention due to it dripping with crap. Was virtually apple "reality distortion field" like.
 
AMD commented to pc world about the article with this response:


Update: Drew Prairie, AMD’s VP of communications, reached out with the following clarification: “We are shipping below consumption because there is too much inventory in the channel and that partners want to carry lower levels of inventory based on the demand they are seeing and their expectations for their business…the idea we are doing this to keep prices “elevated” isn’t accurate. Our client ASP was flat year over year, and that is due to mix of CPUs shipped.”

This article originally published with the headline “AMD is ‘undershipping’ chips to keep CPU, GPU prices elevated” but it has been updated to reflect AMD’s clarification.
 
All points can be true at the same time.

But the only one which matters is that AMD doesn't see any money in trying to sell more of its products for less.
 
still waiting for my AMD divvy :)


Can't tell if serious.. :) AMD don't pay dividends, not since 1997.

I can see why Intel cut theirs and i don't blame them, it is an incentive to invest in the first place but giving people a share of your profits can be very costly, especially if you're already struggling to make any, which Intel are.

Some investors are not going to be happy about it, because gib muh money... Intel's shares are down to under $26, its as low as its ever been and their market cap is in danger of falling below $100 Billion. To put that in to perspective AMD bought ATI for $5.7 Billion, Xilinx for $42 Billion and Pensando for $3 Billion.
 
Last edited:
AMD GPU and console revenue catching up to Nvidia:
 
AMD GPU and console revenue catching up to Nvidia:

While AMD Radeon PC discrete GPUs have a lot of catching up to do against NVIDIA GeForce products in terms of market-share, the two companies' quarterly revenue figures paint a very different picture. For Q4 2022, AMD pushed $1.644 billion in GPU products encompassing all its markets, namely the semicustom chips powering Xbox Series X/S and PlayStation 5 consoles; and AMD Radeon products. In the same period, NVIDIA raked in $1.831 billion in revenues from semicustom chips powering Nintendo Switch console, GeForce NOW cloud-gaming service, and NVIDIA GeForce products. In purely revenue terms, AMD is bringing in 89% the revenue of NVIDIA from client graphics IP, which begins to explain how AMD is a major player in this market.

I find that really interesting.... AMD only have 10% of the discrete GPU market and they are cheaper GPU's than Nvidia, so that's not where the revenue came from.
Consoles:

XBox Series X
XBox Series S
Playstation 5
Steamdeck

And Steamdeck like handhelds.

GPD WIN 4
AYANEO
ONEXPlayer
AYN Odin

That's as tragic as it is impressive.
 
Last edited:
I find that really interesting.... AMD only have 10% of the discrete GPU market and they are cheaper GPU's than Nvidia, so that's not where the revenue came from.
Consoles:

XBox Series X
XBox Series S
Playstation 5
Steamdeck

And Steamdeck like handhelds.

GPD WIN 4
AYANEO
ONEXPlayer
AYN Odin

That's as tragic as it is impressive.

The problem is the obsession with margins is mainly to drive stock market speculators. But in the realworld revenue has an impact and so does economies of scale. This is what companies in the west always forget,and why in many areas companies from other parts of the world didn't forget the lower end and mainstream segments and went for volume and now are big players in many industries.
 
The problem is the obsession with margins is mainly to drive stock market speculators. But in the realworld revenue has an impact and so does economies of scale. This is what companies in the west always forget,and why in many areas companies from other parts of the world didn't forget the lower end and mainstream segments and went for volume and now are big players in many industries.
but BOM, but R&D, but poor investors, but margins no lower than x% or else the company is going down! but... but....
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom