Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,376
- Location
- Planet Earth
The card is meant to have 2816 shaders it seems.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The card is meant to have 2816 shaders it seems.
Was thinking of selling my 780 for the top end AMD card but I think I'll pass now that I've seen the numbers, Not enough of a performance increase to switch, I think I'll wait for Maxwell![]()
Actually doing the numbers and giving it some thought using a HD 7970 as a comparison the R9 290X should be looking at a graphics score around 9500 and an overclocked graphics score of 11000.
So yes there is something very odd about the numbers on that graph.
No price for 290x and no specs.
Just a waste of online time for me.
Like I said over a week ago the 7990 will be the current best buy whilst sub £500 as faster.![]()
Like I said over a week ago the 7990 will be the current best buy whilst sub £500 as faster.![]()
Like I said over a week ago the 7990 will be the current best buy whilst sub £500 as faster.![]()
How will the 290x compare to the titan/780 on performance terms? People here seem to think a overclocked 7950 can beat it?![]()
![]()
I've been holding off since Monday to order a 7990 and I need a new graphics card for battlefield 4, so what do you reckon go ahead and order it and upgrade in a couple of years.playing at 1920x1080.
oooo im getting more excited! either way im going AMD again as pretty much all the games i want to play are with AMD gaming evolved...
so when do we hear more about the R9 290X? next week?