• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Radeon R9 290X with Hawaii GPU pictured, has 512-bit 4GB Memory

Clock for clock, the 290X scored about 1000 points more than my Titan. When I put the memory at -500 and left the Core at 1000Mhz, the 290X scored 400 points more than me (this was fire strike). So a good possibility at stock, it has the edge on a Titan.

I am very curious to know how much headroom they have for overclocking. They have 780's that I can't catch in the ocn.net valley thread and I will be watching very closely at how well the 290X operforms and might have to break out some volts again if need be :)

That makes it 8% faster than the Titan clock for clock, it wouldn't need to clock as high, its quite a margin and don't forget: overclocking it not linear, you need to add 10% to the clocks to gain 5% performance.

Hawaii XT is a much smaller DIE than GK110, how the hell AMD manadged that must rank as the nineth wonder of the world.... it could be a good thing in terms of power consumption, giving it plenty of room, or (like with Haswell and Ivy Bridge CPU's) if the transistors are to closley packed together it might run a little warmer than Tahiti per watt, tho that can be overcome with good cooling.

Personally, i think it will trade blows with the mighty Titan once its in the users rig.
 
That makes it 8% faster than the Titan clock for clock, it wouldn't need to clock as high, its quite a margin and don't forget: overclocking it not linear, you need to add 10% to the clocks to gain 5% performance.

Hawaii XT is a much smaller DIE than GK110, how the hell AMD manadged that must rank as the nineth wonder of the world.... it could be a good thing in terms of power consumption, giving it plenty of room, or (like with Haswell and Ivy Bridge CPU's) if the transistors are to closley packed together it might run a little warmer than Tahiti per watt, tho that can be overcome with good cooling.

Personally, i think it will trade blows with the mighty Titan once its in the users rig.

That was an early report and could be fake, so as always....Pinch of salt.
 
people do often see nvidia as the safer option.

regardless of if true ! there years of strong marketing have put them in this position. so yes many people are blinded by marketing and thats the whole point of marketing !

people i know now will still use nvidia first without even considering ati cards from drivers issues from ten years ago :p just how people are.


so yes the amd card needs to be cheaper than a 780 gtx or it will probably struggle unless a lot faster.

The gaming world is changing currently, wont be long until someone buying another brand than AMD will be rediculed for such buy.
a PC is good to use for any task today, but when we want brute force for work like videoencoding or gaming we justify a purchase due to our enjoyment of it.
if Mantle becomes the hit, well we are at least I think so with gaming since BF4 is my main game then what we percived to be wont be anymore much like VCR, floppydiscs, CD players....

AMD is about to transforming its brand image big time.
its happening right now.
 
That was an early report and could be fake, so as always....Pinch of salt.


Very true, agreed, but, there have been so many independent reports all saying the same thing, including retailers putting those specifications up.

It is possible to shrink a DIE without shrinking the node, it requires a complete redesign, from the drawring board and all that.

Having said that, growing the GPU by 40% while only using 15% more space would be quite an achievement.
 
Last edited:
Remember the specs leaked yonks ago? That had 64rops and a 512bit bus. That will certainly throw a spanner in the works, if true. :D

yeah...

ROP's seems to be the one thing that no one it sure of, one report had it at 40, what?
 
I would have thought it would have 48. 44 always seemed a bit strange to me, but i don't know enough about how it all works so there you go.
 
I would have thought it would have 48. 44 always seemed a bit strange to me, but i don't know enough about how it all works so there you go.


its 48 or 64 isn't it, 12 + 12 + 12 + 8... no.

12 + 12 + 12 + 12 or 16 + 16 + 16 + 16.
 
Very true, agreed, but, there have been so many independent reports all saying the same thing, including retailers putting those specifications up.

It is possible to shrink a DIE without shrinking the node, it requires a complete redesign, from the drawring board and all that.

Having said that, growing the GPU by 40% while only using 15% more space would be quite an achievement.


Any one that has the specs right now is probably under NDA. I guess companies who want to take pre-orders are putting something, anything on their websites to get the money in.

Anyone who knows isn't talking, and those that are talking don't know.
 
if it can't match or beat the Titan, its a pointless GPU, whatever the launch price it will end up sub £450, posibly as low as £400 in no time at all, the 290 will end up sub £350.

It would not be pointless at all, it would still be a lot faster than anything else AMD have to offer.
 
The 290x is going to be price at 699$ LoL

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/radeon-r9-290x-price,24529.html#xtor=RSS-998

So after etailer gouging I predict it's going to be £579 inc

Stop, dude. This isn't any kind of proof.

this is misleading, for 2 reasons

1. the source of the 'newegg price' is extracted from html code, thus not anywhere near as final as the article makes it sound

2. this $729 price is for the pre-order Battlefield 4 bundle, and GUARANTEES release day shipping for the GPU. BF4 costs $60 by itself, and day-one shipping may come at a premium.

Again, I'm not saying that the new card will cost $599, just saying that the article is a bit misleading
 
I hope it's £400 to £450 ish but I can't see it - after all it was AMD who started the GPU price hike.
 
Back
Top Bottom