Quite possibly but remember what Gibbo said...They can alter prices an hour prior to release, so keep an open mind.
Indeed. It is clear that even AMD don't have a final confirmed price they are happy with yet.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Quite possibly but remember what Gibbo said...They can alter prices an hour prior to release, so keep an open mind.
Clock for clock, the 290X scored about 1000 points more than my Titan. When I put the memory at -500 and left the Core at 1000Mhz, the 290X scored 400 points more than me (this was fire strike). So a good possibility at stock, it has the edge on a Titan.
I am very curious to know how much headroom they have for overclocking. They have 780's that I can't catch in the ocn.net valley thread and I will be watching very closely at how well the 290X operforms and might have to break out some volts again if need be![]()
That makes it 8% faster than the Titan clock for clock, it wouldn't need to clock as high, its quite a margin and don't forget: overclocking it not linear, you need to add 10% to the clocks to gain 5% performance.
Hawaii XT is a much smaller DIE than GK110, how the hell AMD manadged that must rank as the nineth wonder of the world.... it could be a good thing in terms of power consumption, giving it plenty of room, or (like with Haswell and Ivy Bridge CPU's) if the transistors are to closley packed together it might run a little warmer than Tahiti per watt, tho that can be overcome with good cooling.
Personally, i think it will trade blows with the mighty Titan once its in the users rig.
people do often see nvidia as the safer option.
regardless of if true ! there years of strong marketing have put them in this position. so yes many people are blinded by marketing and thats the whole point of marketing !
people i know now will still use nvidia first without even considering ati cards from drivers issues from ten years agojust how people are.
so yes the amd card needs to be cheaper than a 780 gtx or it will probably struggle unless a lot faster.
That was an early report and could be fake, so as always....Pinch of salt.
WhyCry is saying he has "2 sources" claiming it's 64 ROPs now.
http://videocardz.com/46303/amd-radeon-r9-290x-final-specifications-bf4-bundle-available-preorder
64 rops?
That's some increase from 44.![]()
64 rops?
That's some increase from 44.![]()
Yep, that is 20![]()
Seems an odd number of ROP's to have. 44.
Remember the specs leaked yonks ago? That had 64rops and a 512bit bus. That will certainly throw a spanner in the works, if true.![]()
I would have thought it would have 48. 44 always seemed a bit strange to me, but i don't know enough about how it all works so there you go.
Very true, agreed, but, there have been so many independent reports all saying the same thing, including retailers putting those specifications up.
It is possible to shrink a DIE without shrinking the node, it requires a complete redesign, from the drawring board and all that.
Having said that, growing the GPU by 40% while only using 15% more space would be quite an achievement.
if it can't match or beat the Titan, its a pointless GPU, whatever the launch price it will end up sub £450, posibly as low as £400 in no time at all, the 290 will end up sub £350.
The 290x is going to be price at 699$ LoL
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/radeon-r9-290x-price,24529.html#xtor=RSS-998
So after etailer gouging I predict it's going to be £579 inc
this is misleading, for 2 reasons
1. the source of the 'newegg price' is extracted from html code, thus not anywhere near as final as the article makes it sound
2. this $729 price is for the pre-order Battlefield 4 bundle, and GUARANTEES release day shipping for the GPU. BF4 costs $60 by itself, and day-one shipping may come at a premium.
Again, I'm not saying that the new card will cost $599, just saying that the article is a bit misleading