Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Good card, wrong pricing. Just like Fury X and Fury.
To be fair Boom I think AMD must have known how constrained HBM1 was going to be and written off this generation of cards in advance. It'd be silly of them to price them any lower at present, maybe in 6 months the constraints will be lifted and they'll be able to move the prices!??
All-in-all the Fury line won't be released in any meaningful numbers until the HBM process gets sorted![]()
small one. Price needs to come down from $649 to sell in big numbers.
Hisense unveils £450 4K Ultra HD TV in the UK, The UHD trio also feature HDMI 2.0 ports
Looking at AMD's own slides, at 4K the GTX 970 Mini ITX gives 70% of Nano performance for around ~ 50% of the price. Plus at 1080P / 1440P the performance gap will likely shrink as Nvidia's cards do better at lower res.
I.e, as a niche card just for 4K this card has a market, but it's a very very small one. Price needs to come down from $649 to sell in big numbers, but maybe that's not what this is designed for..
So at these prices I think the Gigabyte MITX GTX 970 with Phantom Pain is the better deal.
Good card, wrong pricing. Just like Fury X and Fury.
The problem here is anything above the GTX 970 / R9 390P is over priced, especially the GTX 980 at close to £200 more than the GTX 970 for 15% more performance.
The Fury None-X is the same price as the GTX 980 and faster, even at 1080P
The problem here is anything above the GTX 970 / R9 390P is over priced, especially the GTX 980 at close to £200 more than the GTX 970 for 15% more performance.
AMD cards sell in big numbers? that will be a first.
Still no word on whether you can Crossfire either and I was really hoping you could because I am restricted on space for a second GPU![]()
Still no word on whether you can Crossfire either and I was really hoping you could because I am restricted on space for a second GPU
So all in all? a complete let down really. Come on AMD ffs sort it out.
I think it was AMDJoe who said they had ramped up HBM production, which he guessed was the reason for the slow stock and things would pick up but that was about a month ago and no sign of that happening.
Regardless of performance between the cards you have your pricing a bit out there humbug.
The 980 is £60 cheaper than the fury
The 980 is only £140 dearer than the 970.
I do totally agree though, that anything over the 970/390 is overpriced. Well saying that it is certainly more than I would be willing to pay for a graphics card.
YOUR BASKET
1 x PowerColor Radeon Fury 4096MB HBM PCI-Express Graphics Card £439.99
1 x Palit GeForce GTX 980 JetStream 4096MB GDDR5 PCI-Express Graphics Card (NE5X980014G2-2042J) £379.99
1 x Zotac GeForce GTX 970 Gaming Edition 4096MB GDDR5 PCI-Express Graphics Card (ZT-90101-10P) £239.99
Total : £1,059.97 (includes shipping : Ex.VAT).
![]()
![]()
![]()
someone on youtube asked an interesting question, if Nano is using Fury X chips, why did AMD not just let third parties make mini Fury Xs ?
someone on youtube asked an interesting question, if Nano is using Fury X chips, why did AMD not just let third parties make mini Fury Xs ?
CrossFire will work as it normally does.
They can do whatever they like. Very few non-reference cards have been produced though because of the unavailability of interposers.
Unless a bottleneck is then hit with HBM production, we should see a bunch of non-reference designs being announced in September / October ... whether there'll be any 'mini' designs, we don't know.