• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD RDNA3 unveiling event

Just a thought, whats stopping AMD adding another GCD to the current PCB. I know it wont double perf as they would likely have to drop clocks a bit to keep in a reasonably power target but anther 50% on top. As well as from what Ive read double stack the catch so even more through put. Where would that land in relation to the 4090 ?
 
AMD also have excess stock.

Neither of them can afford to write them off completely as losses, and whle they are getting cheaper, this is down from £630 to £560, they might have to get cheaper still to get people to buy them in the numbers they need to clear them out, AMD may have to take somewhat of a loss on them to avoid a total loss.

AMD/NV's profit at this point in time is already off the scale, there's probably miles to manoeuvre in pp.
 
Just a thought, whats stopping AMD adding another GCD to the current PCB. I know it wont double perf as they would likely have to drop clocks a bit to keep in a reasonably power target but anther 50% on top. As well as from what Ive read double stack the catch so even more through put. Where would that land in relation to the 4090 ?
Drivers. Getting it to all work together, like a cohesive unit.

It could be their grand plan for RDNA 4.
 
Last edited:
there seems to be a latency issue with mcm designs, especially with games using temporal techniques, we still have sli or crossfire to fall back on
it would be interesting to find out how the design scales though
 
Last edited:
Drivers. Getting it to all work together, like a cohesive unit.

It could be their grand plan for RDNA 4.

I did wonder that, Though the expeience from their zen CPU's would have greatly helped I would expect. But you are proberbly right that it will be a RDNA4 thing. That may genuinely be a real pain in NV's side if AMD cracks it!
 
Would having a separate chiplet for RT work? If so it would make sense if AMD were aiming towards that eventually, if they manage to have acceptable latency.
 
Just a thought, whats stopping AMD adding another GCD to the current PCB. I know it wont double perf as they would likely have to drop clocks a bit to keep in a reasonably power target but anther 50% on top. As well as from what Ive read double stack the catch so even more through put. Where would that land in relation to the 4090 ?

Workstation GPU's (CDNA) already do this, i don't know if it would work for gaming GPU's, it may need some more engineering work, but once cracked, if not already, holly poo.... RIP Nvidia.
 
Last edited:
I did wonder that, Though the expeience from their zen CPU's would have greatly helped I would expect. But you are proberbly right that it will be a RDNA4 thing. That may genuinely be a real pain in NV's side if AMD cracks it!
Slow down buddy, I said could not would. I don't need leaker channels quoting me for the rumour mill on RDNA 4 :D:cry:
 
Last edited:
Arrogance is my guess. They have started to believe their own marketing BS that ray tracing is the only thing that matters.

For evidence of this arrogance just look at those 4080 prices and the utterly ridiculous notion that the promise of DLSS 3.0 was anything other than a sick joke.

its a long term strategic vision, thats how nvidia wants to differentiate - i mean you got to look at their presentations and white papers, rasterization isnt a big priority for them and that shows in their die allocation as well. so its going to be rt+dlss for nvidia going forward. i personally find the prospect of dlss exciting, its supposed to be 4x more energy efficient than traditional methods, and looks like the likely upgrade path to 8k without running into energy barriers, the tech's still in its infancy but i find initial implementations promising
 
Workstation GPU's (CDNA) already do this, i don't know if it would work for gaming GPU's, it may need some more engineering work, but once cracked, if not already, holly poo.... RIP Nvidia.

Had forgotten about CDNA. Latancy would also be an issue for those as much as it would be for gaming I would have thought so they may well have gotten over the top of the hill with it.

Could be interesting where they go with it .
 
For now separating the Memory Controllers and Cache from the main die is quite a significant thing in its self.

SDRAM does not scale anything like Logic with node shrinks, there is almost no scaling at all, so 1MB of Cache is the same size on 5nm as it is on 7nm.

If you can remove that from the Logic and put it on a cheap older node, because it doesn't matter anyway, then you can bring your costs down and yields up.

This is exactly what AMD Did, the Logic is on 5nm while the Chache is on 6nm, the expensive bit, the logic is only 300mm2^, compared to the 600mm2^ Nvidia die with similar performance which on top of that is also on an even more expensive 4nm, the cache around AMD's 300mm2^ logic die costs pennies.

That's how AMD are able to make a 4090 class card at $600 less retail and still make decent margins.
 
Last edited:
For now separating the Memory Controllers and Cache from the main die is quite a significant thing in its self.

SDRAM does not scale anything like Logic with node shrinks, there is almost no scaling at all, so 1MB of Cache is the same size on 5nm as it is on 7nm.

If you can remove that from the Logic and put it on a cheap older node, because it doesn't matter anyway, then you can bring your costs down and yields up.

This is exactly what AMD Did, the Logic is on 5nm while the Chache is on 6nm, the expensive bit, the logic is only 300mm2^, compared to the 600mm2^ Nvidia die with similar performance which on top of that is also on an even more expensive 4nm, the cache around AMD's 300mm2^ logic die costs pennies.

That's how AMD are able to make a 4090 class card at $600 less retail and still make decent margins.

Forgot to add, what AMD could also do is grow that 300m2^ die into something larger by adding more shaders, if they need a wider bus and more cache to drive more shaders they can just "Glue" more cheap chips around it.

Brilliant!
 
I want to give you another perspective.

The RX 6700XT at 335mm2^ is larger than the Logic die of the 7900XTX.

What AMD have cracked here is huge.

 
Last edited:
I want to give you another perspective.

The RX 6700XT at 335mm2^ is larger than the Logic die of the 7900XTX.

What AMD have cracked here is huge.

Last gen chips are 7nm, the new ones are 5nm so a 6700XT would be smaller @5nm. They also pulled out the IF cache and mem controllers. I expected AMD to have an IO die and several compute dies like Ryzen as that would have made them easy to scale, high end with 2+ compute dies, lower end with less. Maybe next generation will do that although GPU’s have more stages than CPU’s so it will be hard to decuple them without adding latency.
 
Last edited:
Fairly unpleasant logic in releasing the high end only then.

Gotta shift the obsolete cards by not releasing their replacements.

What's the odds they have so much stock that this gen will JUST be high end cards.

At least AMD launched the RX7900XTX at $100 below the price of the RX6950XT and has dropped pricing a decent amount on the RDNA2.0 dGPUs.

Nvidia,OTH,has barely reduced prices,and the RTX4060 was to become a £900 RTX4080 12GB and the RTX4070 is a £1300 RTX4080 16GB. Their new dGPUs are doing nothing to reduce the Ampere dGPU prices. They are not even responding to the AMD price cuts!
 
At least AMD launched the RX7900XTX at $100 below the price of the RX6950XT and has dropped pricing a decent amount on the RDNA2.0 dGPUs.

Nvidia,OTH,has barely reduced prices,and the RTX4060 was to become a £900 RTX4080 12GB and the RTX4070 is a £1300 RTX4080 16GB. Their new dGPUs are doing nothing to reduce the Ampere dGPU prices. They are not even responding to the AMD price cuts!

This is the cheapest 3080.

At $1.14 to £ that should be £613 + 20% VAT = £735, its £780. Nvidia are still charging higher than MSRP, its like an addiction, they just can't help themselves stubbornly trying to get us to agree to these inflated prices.


 
Last edited:
Last edited:
People continue to buy Nvidia though just checked Steam survey for October and AMD got destroyed. They clearly don't find AMD GPUs competitive. Is it RT, DLSS, clever marketing, stock levels? Who knows.

AMD could be in single digit marketshare in a few months. Then what? They are getting wiped from the GPU market.
Marketing, mindshare, call it what you will but its real reading general gaming forums the opinion was buy Nvidia doesn't matter what variety so long as its Nvidia. AMD are no good, drivers are crap, etc, etc just repeated verbatim. No questioning no "hang on a minute..." just rumour, hearsay, buzz if you will expressed as fact.
 
Back
Top Bottom