Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,012
Yeah, just means get a lot more on a pallet hence lots lower shipping cost.Now we just get a basic cardboard box a third of the size.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yeah, just means get a lot more on a pallet hence lots lower shipping cost.Now we just get a basic cardboard box a third of the size.
Good god, Intel is so far behind in the rearview mirror, AMD will need some high-powered binoculars to see them
They're a business and need to create content. There's not a lot else going on at the moment.Much as I generally like HUB, I have to admit I can't see why this was necessary. We all know the 9800X3D murders the 14900K, did we really need yet another video on the subject?
Does feel like HUB over-do it with the benchmarks and comparisons sometimes.
They're a business and need to create content. There's not a lot else going on at the moment.
Bucket of cold water time.
The average gamer will not notice anything if they swapped between a 14900K and a 9800X3D.
Those are games configured as a cpu test and not games in a configuration likely for a £2000 gpu and a £500 cpu.
Behold:
12.6% difference at 720p Ultra
7.2% difference at 1080p Ultra
4.1% difference at 1440p Ultra
1.1% difference at 2160p Ultra aka 4K
Then there's work workloads, a 9800X3D does not beat a 14900K in most things.
Game benchmarks on low settings are simply a cpu test that favours 9800X3D. They absolutely do not mean you keep that performance advantage outside those settings.
Yep. Honestly, I am torn between getting a 14700 and a 9800X3D. The problem with the 9800X3D is the price is rising and availability falling, while the 14700K is doing the exact opposite. Also, I already have a board and RAM that would work with the 14700K. My one remaining issue is that I am not sure how much performance I would lose because the board is a Z690 and the RAM is DDR4. Also, I will need a new cooler for the 14700K.
Yep. Honestly, I am torn between getting a 14700 and a 9800X3D. The problem with the 9800X3D is the price is rising and availability falling, while the 14700K is doing the exact opposite. Also, I already have a board and RAM that would work with the 14700K. My one remaining issue is that I am not sure how much performance I would lose because the board is a Z690 and the RAM is DDR4. Also, I will need a new cooler for the 14700K.
I thought I was having problems but mine was fixed by a bios setting instead of leaving it on auto. Even though auto was setting it to the same value as far as I could tellIs it my imagination or do there seem to be an unusual number of people having problems with RAM and the 9800X3D??
Mine is a bit weird and bit of an annoyance.I thought I was having problems but mine was fixed by a bios setting instead of leaving it on auto. Even though auto was setting it to the same value as far as I could tell
I might be wrong, but that sounds like an Asus thing to me, is it an ASUs board?Mine is a bit weird and bit of an annoyance.
If my overclock fails and I need to do a cmos reset, my rig will not power on properly. I have to remove one of the memory sticks to power on, get to bios or desktop, power off and reseat memory before it powers on aga8n. Latest bios too
Sounds like a classic case of PEBKAC my friend.I thought I was having problems but mine was fixed by a bios setting instead of leaving it on auto. Even though auto was setting it to the same value as far as I could tell
I assume they're going to be using the 9800X3D when benchmarking the upcoming GPUs and the video is just to qualify that. If they're asked why they're using the 9800X3D, they can just point to that video.Much as I generally like HUB, I have to admit I can't see why this was necessary. We all know the 9800X3D murders the 14900K, did we really need yet another video on the subject?
Does feel like HUB over-do it with the benchmarks and comparisons sometimes.
Yep. Honestly, I am torn between getting a 14700 and a 9800X3D. The problem with the 9800X3D is the price is rising and availability falling, while the 14700K is doing the exact opposite. Also, I already have a board and RAM that would work with the 14700K. My one remaining issue is that I am not sure how much performance I would lose because the board is a Z690 and the RAM is DDR4. Also, I will need a new cooler for the 14700K.
You're just going to have accept that AMD is ahead this generation and Intel is in the doldrums, staying loyal to Intel isn't going to get you far at the moment theres only so much of putting your fingers in your ears and saying "I can't hear you" is going to carry you. Intel are not your friends (nor AMD for that matter).Much as I generally like HUB, I have to admit I can't see why this was necessary. We all know the 9800X3D murders the 14900K, did we really need yet another video on the subject?
Does feel like HUB over-do it with the benchmarks and comparisons sometimes.
You're just going to have accept that AMD is ahead this generation and Intel is in the doldrums, staying loyal to Intel isn't going to get you far at the moment theres only so much of putting your fingers in your ears and saying "I can't hear you" is going to carry you. Intel are not your friends (nor AMD for that matter).
Much as I generally like HUB, I have to admit I can't see why this was necessary. We all know the 9800X3D murders the 14900K, did we really need yet another video on the subject?
Does feel like HUB over-do it with the benchmarks and comparisons sometimes.
he says on a hardware enthusiast forumI'm going to argue this to the cows come home, but I am tired of the reviewers and their unrealistic tests.
All these numbers are doing is wildly hyping up one CPU to crazy extremes. Everyone MUST have a 9800X3D, when the truth is, with most people the CPU isn't the bottleneck in their system, they are playing at 1440P or 4k and either of these CPU's will run their monitor as fast as it can go.
I mean, don't get me wrong, the 9800X3D is a good CPU, but there are pros and cons to both CPU's, and for 99% of people the 9800X3D shouldn't be the automatic choice. People need to consider a lot more than the 1080P performance.
Because it's a CPU test not a GPU test, they're testing the CPUs and trying to not have the GPUs get in the way.I'm going to argue this to the cows come home, but I am tired of the reviewers and their unrealistic tests.
All these numbers are doing is wildly hyping up one CPU to crazy extremes. Everyone MUST have a 9800X3D, when the truth is, with most people the CPU isn't the bottleneck in their system, they are playing at 1440P or 4k and either of these CPU's will run their monitor as fast as it can go.
I mean, don't get me wrong, the 9800X3D is a good CPU, but there are pros and cons to both CPU's, and for 99% of people the 9800X3D shouldn't be the automatic choice. People need to consider a lot more than the 1080P performance.