Associate
- Joined
- 17 Jul 2019
- Posts
- 191
I wonder if there will be a x670e for £300
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
based on https://www.techpowerup.com/297805/msi-x670-motherboards-listed-for-sale-from-315-usdI wonder if there will be a x670e for £300
rumors range:Any word on when they might hit after the first cpus drop?
rumors range:
7800X3D could release before end of 2022
or, if Raptor Lake doesn't have a big advantage, could wait until Meteor Lake.
So anyone wanting more budget friendly parts on a new platform are priced out and if they want to go with AMD they are forced to buy a 3 year old CPU arc?.But these are no low end chips. Low(ish) core count yes, but performance wise you can expect even a 6 core Zen4 to be faster than most/all current gen CPUs.
DDR5 still comes with premium and AM5 motherboards will be much more expensive than AM4 too.
You pay that premium to get top of the line gaming performance, not "low end"
When things put that way, 16 cores with 5.7-5.8 GHz boost... 7950X starts to look like a bargain to me...
This is nothing newSo anyone wanting more budget friendly parts on a new platform are priced out and if they want to go with AMD they are forced to buy a 3 year old CPU arc?.
Depends how long you plan on keeping it - with AM5 supposedly having a planned 5 year lifespan like AM4, PCI-E 5.0 could become relevant.I see no point in x670, especially now when Pcie 5.0 devices are not common.
Exactly the same as every Intel launch ever - "Halo" parts (12900K) and upper-midrange parts (12600K/12700K) launched first (Q4 '21), with almost every other lower end part (e.g. 12600, 12500, 12300, 12100, G7400, G6900) launching Q1 '22 - potentially up to 6 months later.So anyone wanting more budget friendly parts on a new platform are priced out and if they want to go with AMD they are forced to buy a 3 year old CPU arc?.
Edited that unreadable mess ^^^ sorry about that.
or the socket support could be long lasting like AM4 and could drop in gen5 devices in the futurebased on https://www.techpowerup.com/297805/msi-x670-motherboards-listed-for-sale-from-315-usd
x670e territory starts from 400, but x670 start at 300
I see no point in x670, especially now when Pcie 5.0 devices are not common.
If I was going Zen4, would pair it with top of the line B650. But they are holding its release back so that early buyers all go for the expensive model.
I'd wager a fiver saying that B650E is not a thing. What exactly would constitute a B650E that differentiates it from a X670? You could use a 2nd chipset to certify more PCIe Gen 5 SSDs, but then why bother getting X670?Another possibility is that B650E boards don't exist at all, despite rumours. AMD hasn't mentioned them.
Lots of people will opt for B650 motherboards, which will still have everything people need, except for people who want PCIE5 for graphics cards, who will probably be willing to pay more.I've been saying for months, can't see how AMD can compete with a 13th gen i5, cheap Z690 board and DDR4, for the mainstream builds.
Yes, that's what I was thinking too.I'd wager a fiver saying that B650E is not a thing. What exactly would constitute a B650E that differentiates it from a X670? You could use a 2nd chipset to certify more PCIe Gen 5 SSDs, but then why bother getting X670?
It's a perfectly sound theory given how the tech industry will stagger their offerings. AMD use chiplet designs for CPUs so they can mix and match to make whatever SKUs they need, with varying capabilities. It's logical to assume that a chiplet design for the motherboard chipset would allow similar granular segmentation. Mix and match one or two chiplet dies to create any combination of multiple GPU slots, multiple SSD points, boatloads of IO, and then segment (and price) accordingly.made assumptions that because there's a x670E, there must also be a B650E.
Lots of people will opt for B650 motherboards, which will still have everything people need, except for people who want PCIE5 for graphics cards, who will probably be willing to pay more.
Unfortunately, looks like very few will be getting USB4 boards, whether they choose an AMD or Intel build... Even the top boards have only got 2 USB4 ports anyway, from what I've seen so far.
But, of course, since there's no actual information right now on what AMD is going to do, you gotta get them clicks by just superficially saying "well, of course there's a B650E because there's a X670E" without actually analysing what such chipset combinations would offer, and how they overlap. That's what speculation is supposed to be.
B650 prices are set to be much more than their AM4 counterparts, plus doesn't negate the need for expensive DDR5.