Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 22,989
- Location
- London
If only it were that easy.
Why isnt it? What's the problemo?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
If only it were that easy.
Given up on mine abit too. Cant get my 3600Mhz RAM to run stably after much tinkering. It will POST and boot into windows and run memory tests and benches all day long. But gaming...Start to hear the audio break up then crashes to a reboot. CBA with faffing too much and hope new BIOS's etc will enhance compatability down the line.
Not all E-die or B-die can go that high.Why isnt it? What's the problemo?
Best i can get with one of my 3700x on a Tomahawk b350 with beta bios thus far ..still tweaking ...its a pain one wrong move and its pull out battery time.. as clear cmos does not work with this bios..
one thing that caught my attention was low write speeds re way AMD had changed the byte cycles .. does not effect the 3900x just the rest
however some reviewers where getting higher write scores with the 3700x as seen in the link below and a few pages in ..could this be just the reviewers just being lazy & disabling cores on the 3900x to make a 3700x
https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/...lf-the-performance-on-single-ccd-cpus.257182/
whats your thought on this ?
Look at this I was right for around 3 years worth of ryzen cpus overclocking STUNNING but Since I dont have tech channel or web site no one will listen as always.Hardware unboxed's vid today is showing that manually tuning RAM can make a bigger difference in games than just clock rate where it's CPU limited.
No they are not. I got my own section on polish forums Ask Zeed about memories testing and stability. And memory tuning on intel does not give as much barely anything. Its cause of chiplet and ccx design zen2 is using.They don't compare the 9900K in that benchmark, but as it was only about 3fps ahead at very high quality settings, it's likely the 3900X with tuned memory is very comfortably ahead of the 9900K at 5GHz -- not totally fair as the Intel wasn't tuned, but I don't think it gains much at all from it.
No they are not. I got my own section on polish forums Ask Zeed about memories testing and stability. And memory tuning on intel does not give as much barely anything. Its cause of chiplet and ccx design zen2 is using.
Give people few months and they will discover that locking games to obe chiplet and system task to first with process laso also gives performance in games on 13 core cpu cause 12 threads is enough for 90%games iw tested hehe. Aaa and random hickup is also gone at least when playing raids in wow on dx12 and same with division 2 .
I don't think the tech media will ever allow us to see that comparison. Though in reality, that's the one we all want to see; best possible performance from each product, exotic cooling aside.Yeah I'd heard that memory tuning on Intel doesn't do much. It looks like if you tuned 3600MHz memory, which basically all 3900x can do fine, and then compared with the 9900K at 5GHz the gaming results would overall come out with the 3900X on top, with some games 10-20% faster.
I don't think the tech media will ever allow us to see that comparison. Though in reality, that's the one we all want to see; best possible performance from each product, exotic cooling aside.
I could ask UFO th run me some benchmatk of Tuned vs XMP on hest 5ghz intel in some game.Yeah I'd heard that memory tuning on Intel doesn't do much. It looks like if you tuned 3600MHz memory, which basically all 3900x can do fine, and then compared with the 9900K at 5GHz the gaming results would overall come out with the 3900X on top, with some games 10-20% faster.
You haven't dip your toe in until you've done 1.5v
Oh, those bloody hickup and random crashes (even on stable stock system) with dx12 is why a lot of ppl (me including) playing with dx11 (nvm 20-30% fps drop)in division2. Going to test now with tight timings etcNo they are not. I got my own section on polish forums Ask Zeed about memories testing and stability. And memory tuning on intel does not give as much barely anything. Its cause of chiplet and ccx design zen2 is using.
Give people few months and they will discover that locking games to obe chiplet and system task to first with process laso also gives performance in games on 13 core cpu cause 12 threads is enough for 90%games iw tested hehe. Aaa and random hickup is also gone at least when playing raids in wow on dx12 and same with division 2 .
Well I dont have hickups or random crash like at all nto sicne I'w set up my rig to use 1 chiplet for gaming other for system :]Oh, those bloody hickup and random crashes (even on stable stock system) with dx12 is why a lot of ppl (me including) playing with dx11 (nvm 20-30% fps drop)in division2. Going to test now with tight timings etc
I bought the x570 on the mm, in considering seeing if he'll take it back but I doubt itWell I dont have hickups or random crash like at all nto sicne I'w set up my rig to use 1 chiplet for gaming other for system :]
Made small video how i got stuff set up atm: @humbug there ya go 3900x power in actuall use
@Illuminist can You send that junk back and get something that is not gigabyte ?? Or You are stuck with 1 board with crap vrm and other that got good vrm but runs like **** ??
Hardware unboxed's vid today is showing that manually tuning RAM can make a bigger difference in games than just clock rate where it's CPU limited.