Ryzen 9 3900X 12C/24T £499
X470 Aorus Ultra £129.99
Total £628.99
9900K £469.99
Z390 Aorus Pro £160
Total £629.99
The Intel has 4 less cores for £1 extra. Surely the 3900X will completely detroy the 9900K?
8+2 VRM with 200W+ on the 3900X when you make use of full PBO on lots of cores, not for me, it will run pretty hot and if I'm buying 12 cores I want max boost available.
On reflection Z390 + 9700K for ~£500 all in looks to be decent value for the next few years of gaming when AMD are getting close to £350 for a mobo. In productivity work loads 12 cores will thrash it, but in most games and non time dependant use it would be fine, especially at 1440P. No fussy memory etc. I want 4 dimms at > 3200Mhz, reasonable timings.
Anyhow, it's a protest vote where I'd be prepared to risk a slightly worse option rather than pay double the price of a motherboard just because it has PCI-E 4 and A VRM similar to Z390.
There are principles, I'd like to support AMD having used their X64, X2 and Opteron back in the day but if they plan to scalp with insane priced premium motherboards then I'll give my cash to Intel / Nvidia.
Customers vote with there wallets and right now, AMD platform seems to be making Intel look like the value option.
For a 6-8 core, most X470's are fine, but there are very few X470 boards which can exploit the high core chips, at least in my opinion.
having bought 'value' boards in the past, abit fatal1ty fp-in9 sli fatality springs to mind, I'll never buy another fatality branded product or skimp on technical features - VRM, BIOS, Memory compatibility.