Caporegime
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 53,750
- Location
- Welling, London
I’ve bought 16GB of 3200mhz Kingston Hyper X predator RGB. Samsung B-Die and easily upgrades to 3600mhz, which is the sweet spot apparently.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***
- Thread starter Jamin280672
- Start date
Please don't post that nonsense, it's so fake it hurts me to even have to point it out.
Oh great master of the internet, tell us all what is 'so fake' about it?
Would the first step, trying to legitimise an early review, be to post blurred out pictures of the only thing that would - the CPU itself?
Everything that's there could've been done by anyone with a free afternoon and MS Paint.
Would you want the serial number of your CPU giving up the supplier of the CPU to AMD? I guess you are new at this.
It was stock, they stated in the the article x470 mono didn't allow for overclocking of the 3000 series. 4.2Ghz is the single core boost. CPUZ reports the highest single core frequency.
Thought about that, why is the back blurred out? Could've just blurred out that single string of info.Would you want the serial number of your CPU giving up the supplier of the CPU to AMD? I guess you are new at this.
Article states, but for now the overclock does not work on the chosen motherboard.
You can see the Cinebench R15 scores are the same in the article at stock at over 1500 points, would be interesting to see all cores at 4.2Ghz. serious power there for £200.
https://elchapuzasinformatico.com/2019/06/amd-ryzen-5-3600-x470-review/#benchmarks
Single sting? Nope, you need to blur out the QR code too, and the batch number etc. Maybe there was an identifying mark on the back, maybe they just wanted to keep it consistent, but a blurry photo does not make a fake review.
So, why is it 'so fake'?
yeah av been looking at the 8 pack 3200 and 3600 and just dunno what way to go. will obviously need to make my mind up shortly.
The way I interpret it, I think you'll likely see the same clock speeds around 8 core utilisation as TDP is reached. Then as the 12c utilises the extra 4, all core speed will drop lower still to stay within the envelope.
some titles are a wash, nice to see there's still some scaling with CS:GO, suggests good SC performance, GTA V I think around 175ish FPS is where the engine falls to bits and becomes a stuttery mess
As stated before the blurring is done so AMD does not know who supplied the CPU for the leak.
I'm pretty sure this site has a history of leaking performance reviews early. I think it was Zen 1 I remember them for doing.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 53,750
- Location
- Welling, London
But if you have a 144Hz monitor, you’re not going to notice any differences in FPS over 144 are you?
Correct. I think only CS:GO is weird about wanting double the hz in FPS to look nice.
The FPS difference on titles says something, true (the 2 slides) but... I reckon that'll be without letting PBO stretch it's legs.
Yep, and especially with *Sync anything over 100fps looks perfect.
Associate
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2017
- Posts
- 1,969
You've not been paying attention then
The 3950X has a 4.7ghz boost - it's the highest in the stack.
highest boost on how many cores?
when overclocked all core 3950x on LN2 5.3 ghz compared to 3900 on LN2 6.0 ghz.
Hmmm, I'd missed that (only heard about 3950x ln2). Fair enough in that case.
May... still be rather different on "normal" cooling but... we're still at "educated speculation" stage for everything so fair enough.
That 3950X on LN2 was an ES, not the final silicon. I'm more interested to see OC performance on the final silicon for that CPU