Caporegime
9600X: $269.99
9700X: $349.99
9900X: $449.99
9950X: $599.99
Would be my guess.
If true i'm $10 off on two...
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
9600X: $269.99
9700X: $349.99
9900X: $449.99
9950X: $599.99
Would be my guess.
It's interesting to look back and compare how the early rumours regarding Zen 5 panned out. In Paul's case above I would say it's not too bad, he got the right the bits about the cache redesign and L1 being larger, cores per CCX (although this was pretty obvious to anyone who follows this stuff this would be the case) and the front end being wider but his IPC rumour in terms of a Geomean was a complete miss and a big one as well.Difficult to know.
You're right the article doesn't talk about IPC, and yet the slide does, but it also qualifies that with (1T) its as if it the slide was made by someone who doesn't understand what IPC is, qualifying threads is irrelevant when quoting IPC, you would only do that if you were including clock speeds which are usually different 1T to nT.
Some people use IPC and clock speeds interchangeably, which is idiotic, they have no understanding of it.... given the poor quality of todays tech journalists i'm going to assume they are idiots and agree its probably a combilation of clock speed and IPC.
It's interesting to look back and compare how the early rumours regarding Zen 5 panned out. In Paul's case above I would say it's not too bad, he got the right the bits about the cache redesign and L1 being larger, cores per CCX (although this was pretty obvious to anyone who follows this stuff this would be the case) and the front end being wider but his IPC rumour in terms of a Geomean was a complete miss and a big one as well.
Asking nearly £300 for 6 cores in 2024 is almost as bad as Nvidia wanting just under £400 for the 4060ti 8gb.
Rubbish pricing as the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is cheaper and faster in games and probably costs more to make. The process node AMD using isn't also leading edge either.Am personally expecting the 9700X to be a straight £350, which doesn't seem too bad. Also for the 7800X3D to still edge it in games (at stock).
I’m sure chips like the 9600X will end up being good value eventually but it’s just a shame AMD rewards the pioneers with 2 less cores for the same money as opposed to someone buying a few months later.
They do the same with GPUs though so maybe enough people do buy at the initial higher pricing to make it worthwhile.
It’s normally about 2-3 months before prices drop.The 7000 series currently fill the value spots. Come back in 12 months.
Am personally expecting the 9700X to be a straight £350, which doesn't seem too bad. Also for the 7800X3D to still edge it in games (at stock).
It’s normally about 2-3 months before prices drop.
I got one of theseThose are high prices for such a mediocre gain over Zen 4, I'd expect them to come down quite quickly in the next few months.
I got one of thesefor <200 anyway, had a feeling AMD would price the new chips stupidly again, and I also got thisrecently for <300 because I like how snappy the 960GB one is.
Not sure if the pack date is same as production date? Thought Intel stopped making these drives.
Well 13900K is still £500+ so in all honesty i do not really see the reported AMD pricing as all that badAsking nearly £300 for 6 cores in 2024 is almost as bad as Nvidia wanting just under £400 for the 4060ti 8gb.
Just because intel is having problems doesn’t mean we should welcome AMDs pricing especially when the 6 core is only giving 3 year old £150 intel cpu performance on multicore.Well 13900K is still £500+ so in all honesty i do not really see the reported AMD pricing as all that bad
Just because intel is having problems doesn’t mean we should welcome AMDs pricing especially when the 6 core is only giving 3 year old £150 intel cpu performance on multicore.