• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Zen 5 rumours

20% would be pritty epic and definitely worth holding out for. 5-10% not so much.

I didn't whatch all of that video and i didn't get to the point where he puts his claims in on IPC, because like a typical Youtuber chasing the Youtube algorithm 19 minutes of his 20 minute video is him rambling on and on and on..... to fill out 20 minutes of video.

But, i know there are rumours out there of IPC numbers like 30%.

No......

10 or 15% IPC with a 2 to 5% clock bump is realistic.
 
Last edited:
The thing to remember is this.

Efficiency isn't power consumption, its power consumption for a given workload over time, people made this mistake when they challenged Steve Burke to undervolt Intel CPU's and put them up against AMD's CPU to show they are in fact not "more efficient" Which Steve did, AMD's CPU's still did more work per watt than Intel's CPU's, this with AMD's CPU's untouched, to which Steve made the point AMD's CPU's can also be undervolted, so shut up! :D

The c core use less power because they don't clock as high, so less volts, but given that they also don't do the same amount of work as the standard cores.

And here is the thing about modern cores, they will only use as much power as they need for a given workload, i know the cores in my 5800X will scale anything from 0.002 watts to 12 watts, if its only doing "light background tasks" the cores will only use so much power as it needs to do that, the CPU does not need to be an older generation smaller core to save power on these light tasks, your big core will do that because they simply will not burn more power than they need to.

In fact i would argue that AMD full fat Zen 4 cores are more efficient at these tasks than Intel 14'th Gen little cores simply by virtue that they are newer more advanced cores, i can say that with confidence because no matter what workload, light work, heavy work or idle AMD's all big core Laptop's always win the battery longevity tests with the same size KW/h battery.

I repeat....
I understand what you're saying but at the same time it's mind boggling. You sir are a smart man. I wish I would've knuckled down in school. I unfortunately fell in with the wrong crowd. Oh well
 
20% would be pritty epic and definitely worth holding out for. 5-10% not so much.

Zen 2 to 3 was 19% ipc uplift and Zen 5 is an even larger change than Zen 3 was. Of course that does not guarantee higher IPC uplift but it does increase the potential.

I didn't whatch all of that video and i didn't get to the point where he puts his claims in on IPC, because like a typical Youtuber chasing the Youtube algorithm 19 minutes of his 20 minute video is him rambling on and on and on..... to fill out 20 minutes of video.

But, i know there are rumours out there of IPC numbers like 30%.

No......

10 or 15% IPC with a 2 to 5% clock bump is realistic.

There is a poster over at AnandTech Forums who has claimed 32% Spec Int Rate 2017 single thread IPC uplift. If it is true or how that translates to other workloads no idea.

There is also talk of a small clock regression which will also impact overall performance.

Given the scale of the changes I would not be surprised with a 30 or 40% performance bump but I would not be surprised if there were unfixed challenges which reduce that down to the teens so a large performance spectrum.
 
my current CPU is my first AMD in almost 20 years, and i can tell you for the price its got incredible performance in gaming. Its going to take quite a jump to get me to move.
wanted to rain on your parade and say "9800X3D will be out maybe this year and give 20% more gaming perf"
But at this level the improvement will be academical, only realised in select games at way too high refresh rates. GPUs and monitors need to catch up first
 
Any rumours that they might do a 12/16-core single CCD with 3D-cache chip at all?

Haven't been watching the tube much lately so out of the loop. But my next upgrade will have to be a full platform shift as I'm on a 5800X3D right now so waiting for more than another 8 core.
 
The thing to remember is this.

Efficiency isn't power consumption, its power consumption for a given workload over time, people made this mistake when they challenged Steve Burke to undervolt Intel CPU's and put them up against AMD's CPU to show they are in fact not "more efficient" Which Steve did, AMD's CPU's still did more work per watt than Intel's CPU's, this with AMD's CPU's untouched, to which Steve made the point AMD's CPU's can also be undervolted, so shut up! :D

The c core use less power because they don't clock as high, so less volts, but given that they also don't do the same amount of work as the standard cores.

And here is the thing about modern cores, they will only use as much power as they need for a given workload, i know the cores in my 5800X will scale anything from 0.002 watts to 12 watts, if its only doing "light background tasks" the cores will only use so much power as it needs to do that, the CPU does not need to be an older generation smaller core to save power on these light tasks, your big core will do that because they simply will not burn more power than they need to.

In fact i would argue that AMD full fat Zen 4 cores are more efficient at these tasks than Intel 14'th Gen little cores simply by virtue that they are newer more advanced cores, i can say that with confidence because no matter what workload, light work, heavy work or idle AMD's all big core Laptop's always win the battery longevity tests with the same size KW/h battery.

I repeat....
You sir are a smart man.
r7BZgUR.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom