"Ive" not been wrong about a lot so far.
"Bare" in mind
Grammar Nazi says you're wrong on at least two counts so far.
Oh and as JediFragger said those reviews are completely unreliable and they even admit it.
Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
"Ive" not been wrong about a lot so far.
"Bare" in mind
I rest my case. Bull****.insiders
this is 9900X vs 7900X, its pretty easy to work it out yourself from there,
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X vs Ryzen 9 7900X: performance comparison
We compared 12-core AMD Ryzen 9 9900X (4.4 GHz) against Ryzen 9 7900X (4.7 GHz) in games and benchmarks. Find out which CPU has better performance.nanoreview.net
a 7900X and 7900X3d perform the same, the X3D just does it at a lower TDP, whereas the X has the frequency advantage across all cores.
Ryzen 7900X vs 7900X3D: The Efficiency Battle - G2 Digital
In today’s highly competitive tech landscape, power efficiency and performance are paramount, especially for data centre managers, users of high-performance workstations and anyone with concerns about power consumption. With AMD’s groundbreaking 3D V-Cache technology the Ryzen 9 7900X3D offers a...g2digital.co.uk
Ive not been wrong about a lot so far.
And finally, 9900X vs 7900X3D
https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-vs-amd-ryzen-9-7900x3d
Bare in mind, all of the 9000 series chips are ES samples, no one owns one yet, so they could improve even further.
Please note that the tests on the Ryzen 9 9900X are done on engineering sample provided by our insiders. The data will be more accurate after we get the final version of this CPU.
We compared two 12-core desktop CPUs: the 4.4 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 9900X against the 4.7 GHz Ryzen 9 7900X.
Don't get used to it!!!!Exactly ^^^^^
Oi....
Grammar Nazi says you're wrong on at least two counts so far.
I find myself agreeing more and more with him, think I'm getting oldCant believe I've agreed with humbug
What ? The picture above posted by humbug? the 7900X is 12 core as well.12 core zen5 is faster than 16 core zen4
while running at lower clocks and with just a 16% higher IPC in Cinebench as declared by AMD?
Seems highly suspicious
Exactly my thoughts. Hoping for a 2 ccd 9900X3d as I don't want to drop to 8 cores from my 5900X so if they don't make one I may get a 9950X, either way it will be a huge jump.It would be crazy not to wait now. I have had the "itch" for several months now but somehow managed to stave it off. Personally I will be waiting for the 3d chips to launch. A 9800x3d will be a hell of a jump from my lowly 12600 non k.
this is IPC, so ran at fixed frequency. ST or MT wouldn't make much differenceIf is true then this is misleading, i say misleading because it doesn't state if the R23 result is MT or ST