All of those results seem odd given I don't think most people would think a 8370 as competitively as within 4fps vs a 7700k clocked higher.Oh....
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
All of those results seem odd given I don't think most people would think a 8370 as competitively as within 4fps vs a 7700k clocked higher.Oh....
Well its brand new so bound to have some teething issues. If what was said earlier about motherboard manufacturers initially not being all that interested then changing their minds when better samples appeared they're part of the problem. Probably could have been in much better shape if they had got the thumb out.
Am I the only person not expecting an 8 core to be the king of gaming?
Still performs great for the price from what I'm seeing, it's still half the price of the 6900k remember.
Looks like a standard AMD launch - rush something out half finished.
You would think they would learn by now!!
AMD.AMD never changes.
People want to use the best graphics cards, why would they be using AMDI'm seeing massive differences in results between reviews on the same games.
It's a brand new arch, can't expect all games to make the most of it on launch day. Some reviews (on sites I trust) are where I expected them to be.
Might even improve with video drivers. Are there any reviews using AMD graphics cards out of interest?
I don't think they're part of the problem at all, if they'd taken that CPU we might have a lesser performing part.
I wouldn't ever call Zen rushed given it was touted for 2016
Going to wait for the R5 1600X benchmarks in a few months, may upgrade my 2600 then, if not, Zen+ it is.