I went for the 1700 and Asus Prime bundle yesterday as it was in offer.
The alternative was a 1700x and the MSI Carbon. All in all £100 difference!
---
I don't mind to much that current and older titles might not perform on the Ryzen chips as well as the Intel's. But I've bought the 1700 as its an affordable 8 core chip and I expect 8 cores to be almost the minimum a gamer should expect to have when we move forward with gaming in 2017 and in to 2018.
Two things tipped the balance for me:
1. Seeing how could bottlenecked I was in the Division with my 3570k and 970.
2. If you look at system requirements for current AAA titles they are advising as recommended 8 core CPUs (4790k and 8350).
Let's hope BIOSes continue to improve, ram speeds gets sorted and game developers start to thread their games better!
I do feel like Ryzen will be popular amongst gamers. The combination of price/performance/cores is very tempting even if currently the top gaming chip is still the 7700k.
My advice to someone wanting to upgrade is, if you are someone that upgrades CPU regularly like within 2 years get the 7700k. It's also the chip for high refresh rates. If your someone looking for a chip to last 4+ years then the AM4 platform and Ryzen should be good. With AM4 AMD have said we will get 4 generations of Ryzen and future games should start to utilise more than 4 cores so the Ryzen architecture should start to shine.
Big if's and a lot of work to be done.
But I'm in the boat now!
Ryzen, the Bulldozer I never bought!