Even AdoredTV mentioned it in one of his recent vids, they could have more aggressive with pricing and really spanked Intel but no. Now sales are going back to Intel according to the latest figures, Zen is shifting in tiny margins.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Absolute worst case scenario is Grand theft Auto V and in that the 8100 is 15% ahead of the Ryzen 3's on a GTX 1080TI
Your arguments are turning into straw madness.
1.)Don't work out in price/performance at current pricing.
2.)Are on EOL platforms where a 4C/4T Core i5 is still over £150 in most parts of the world.
3.)CPUs and chipsets which are not even released and nobody has a clue when the ACTUAL RELEASE DATE WILL BE.
4.)Make belief graphics cards which are not even confirmed.
5.)Combos which cost significantly more than a 2200G.
6.)All integrated graphics is crap,so to ignore the advantage AMD has.
7.)Say Intel integrated graphics is fine,so to ignore the advantage AMD has.
8.)Ignore the driver issues Intel does have with their graphics.
9.)Ignore Intel hiring AMD to make a graphics card for them and hiring away AMD personal to make better graphics,which confirms they know their graphics is not great.
10.)Defend Intel graphics despite Intel not even defending it.
11.)Buy secondhand Intel CPUs,even if the same isn't said in Intel threads last time I checked.
Even AdoredTV mentioned it in one of his recent vids, they could have more aggressive with pricing and really spanked Intel but no. Now sales are going back to Intel according to the latest figures, Zen is shifting in tiny margins.
Its the same on AT forums,some people are terrified of Raven Ridge,and if you don't believe me you should see the thread. Interestingly enough it was the same people who said don't get an Intel APU since CPU performance sucks,and now even if CPU performance is fine,now the GPU sucks.
Someone listed some of the ridiculous arguments these lot were doing against Raven Ridge,and it was verging on the surreal:
Heck,we certainly had our arguments about Zen,and certain games I have mentioned it does not do well in,and its an outlying one too. But I am running a GTX1080 FFS,not some lowish end card.
Also,since we are enthusiasts lets price up an Intel Core i3 8100 and GT1030 build:
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/inte...ocket-lga1151-processor-retail-cp-63q-in.html
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/giga...cket-1151-ddr4-atx-motherboard-mb-566-gi.html
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/pali...ddr5-pci-express-graphics-card-gx-043-pl.html
£264.
Now,the Ryzen 3 2200G is $99(so roughly £86),so lets get a decentish B350 board and a RX460:
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/msi-...ocket-am4-ddr4-atx-motherboard-mb-331-ms.html
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/kfa2...ddr5-pci-express-graphics-card-gx-09a-kf.html
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/his-...ddr5-pci-express-graphics-card-gx-10d-hs.html
£266,and I have not even specified the cheapest B350 motherboard either.
AMD AM4 boards start at £44:
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/pc-components/motherboards/amd/am4-x370-b350-ryzen?sPage=1&sSort=3
This is even before,we see the updated 400 series boards in April,which will have updated specs.
Now take away the GPU,and the Core i3 8100,is going to be utterly owned in any kind of gaming.
An A12 9800 owns a Core i5 8400 in almost every game. Bristol Ridge has a very poor memory controller too.
So,the Ryzen 3 2200G has a significantly faster CPU than an A12 9800,a faster GPU,better memory controller and a better cooler.
I can even understand someone getting a Core i5 8400 over a Ryzen 5 1600,but seriously especially if you are running on the IGP or a lowish end card,why the heck would I want to spend more on the Core i3 8100 in 95% of most cases??
You are going to be far more GPU limited,so its best to get a faster card anyway.
Where are these cheaper Intel motherboards??
Its the second week of February,and they were meant to be here by January.
AMD being competitive again is bad news for a small but very loud number of people who are invested in Intel's total dominance of the market.
Intel recently cut back their "Intel Inside" program by 60%, Intel did this because AMD are competitive again, to keep it going with competition they have to start depending on handing out kick backs for not using AMD, which is not only something Intel has bad experience with but is also a very bad business model, paying customers to use your products does in the long run do more harm than good.
That's a lot of people now not getting help from Intel and its AMD who killed that cozy little relationship for them.
Though! if you're that reliant on it you're business model is completely flawed, Intel realized that and did something about it. Its about time all others wised up and took advantage of a competitive AMD instead of moaning about it.
Large OEM's like Dell, HP.... have already, they ain't stupid.
Ryzen was released long before Coffee Lake, remember. The R5 1600 was the sweet spot to begin with and now with Coffee Lake around and the price cuts compressing the tiers, most of the CPUs below it are nearly irrelevant. The R5 2500G is priced below the R5 1500 though, so it fits much better.Edit, actually looking at it i agree with Raven.
The Ryzen 1500 at £150 is too much money, way too much, i had no idea it was basically the same price as the 1600, that's a very strange pricing structure there AMD, current Ryzen 3's shouldn't exist, the 1400 and 1500X should be the £100 Ryzen 3's, its because you have an over bloated range that you have ended up with 4 SKU's all within a tenner of eachother.
You just wouldn't buy the 4 core 1400 or the 1500X with the 6 core 1600 at as near as makes no difference the same price.
The 1400 and 1500X are idiotic at this price point, they should be i3 competitors.
400 series boards will work out the box, 300 series is likely to be luck of the draw as to what bios they ship withI'm getting the Ryzen 5 2400G & use my Asus B350-F Strix Motherboard, I flashed to the latest bios for the new CPU/APU Using my Main R7 1700, Will make a Retro Gaming Build for DOSBOX & Computer Emulators,
Be nice without a dedicated graphics card needed
They will sell like hot-cakes.
Wonder whats going to happen to all the motherboards that not updated on sale of the B350/x370 that not got the bios for them, will a first-time buyer be able to buy a motherboard & say 2400g & it work
just enough for them to dl & flash,
or will first-time buyers have to wait for the Motherboard manufacturer to update the boards,
Or are the X400 Range going to be rel on 13th Feb that will already be updated for them?
You mean like the people likely to be building a 2400g?300 series will be EOL though so only the very budget conscious will buy those with a Ryzen 2xxx.
Only at the beginning. After a month or so the older motherboards will have sold out most likely.You mean like the people likely to be building a 2400g?
Maybe, I don't know if this is possible.Hopefully vendors will offer a bios flash - as I assume there is going to be no way to even get a 2*** to boot without it.
Not necessarily without the correct BIOS version, which older stock will not have.These are the first APU, they are for these boards. So of course all 300 series boards will run these.
Seems the New APUs will boot on the b350s/x370, So you can go into bios & flash to the latest to fully support them
Good news for first time buyers.