That old school is 10 years ago now. The 2080 was $799 on launch and the 2080Ti was $1199 on launch , the 2070 was $599. Heck the GTX 1070 Founders Edition was $449 , 7 years ago
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Any news on 7800 xt?
- Thread starter WonkyEyezJohnny
- Start date
That old school is 10 years ago now. The 2080 was $799 on launch and the 2080Ti was $1199 on launch , the 2070 was $599. Heck the GTX 1070 Founders Edition was $449 , 7 years ago
Well, Nvidia do that too, but they also rob you of VRAM as well.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,204
Yea they are both at it. The biggest one was Nvidia trying to call the RTX 4070 replacement a 4080 with 12gb Vram while wanting to charge £900 for it. Luckily AMD had the 7900 cards so they changed it to 4070ti and still took the ****. Amd did similar with the 7900xt (The real 7800xt) at £900. Horrible time to upgrade.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,204
I got my Vega 64 for £450 with 3 games 5 years back so there was still decent deals in place at the time. Only the 1080ti and Titan cards were faster at the time. The 2 series had not released at the time. Even when it did release it was still just about on par with a 2070 as Vega aged well.
That was a year after it launched!
For the 7800XT.
With 5% more CU's the RX 7900XT is 23% faster than the 6900XT, so 18% more performance per CU.
If you add that on top on the RX 6800 here, which also has 60 CU's it comes in at 77% (4K) on this chart putting it a couple of % above the 6800XT, 7000 series has had some minor overall performance upgrades since this review so maybe at 80%, that puts it 1 percentage point behind the 6900XT, or = to, which is probably what AMD were aiming for. its a 6900XT.
The 7700XT 12% lower puts it at 70, 7% higher than the RX 6800, or 33% higher than the RX 6700XT. Or 62% higher than the 2070 Super.
www.techpowerup.com
www.techpowerup.com
The 6700XT was $480
The 6800 $580
The 6800XT $650
The 6900XT $1000
The 2070 Super $500
The 7700XT $450
The 7800XT $500
With 5% more CU's the RX 7900XT is 23% faster than the 6900XT, so 18% more performance per CU.
If you add that on top on the RX 6800 here, which also has 60 CU's it comes in at 77% (4K) on this chart putting it a couple of % above the 6800XT, 7000 series has had some minor overall performance upgrades since this review so maybe at 80%, that puts it 1 percentage point behind the 6900XT, or = to, which is probably what AMD were aiming for. its a 6900XT.
The 7700XT 12% lower puts it at 70, 7% higher than the RX 6800, or 33% higher than the RX 6700XT. Or 62% higher than the 2070 Super.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT Review
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the same Navi 31 GPU as the XTX, but with fewer chiplets, which helps bring down the price. In our review this $900 graphics card is able to match the performance of GeForce RTX 3090 Ti that launched at $2000 just a few months ago.
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT Review
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT introduces the new Navi 22 GPU, which is optimized to take the fight to NVIDIA in the $500 segment. The RX 6700 XT in our review beats the RTX 3060 Ti with ease and achieves performance that rivals the more expensive RTX 3070, with lower fan noise.
The 6700XT was $480
The 6800 $580
The 6800XT $650
The 6900XT $1000
The 2070 Super $500
The 7700XT $450
The 7800XT $500
Last edited:
My 3070 is currently looking at the inside of its original packaging in storage waiting for a mate to save up enough money to build a new PC, whereby in will donated, for free, to him.
AIB cards pictured here.. https://www.tomshardware.com/news/all-the-amd-rx-7800-xt-and-rx-7700-xt-graphics-cardsI'll have to wait and have a look at the 7800XT AIB's have to offer, the ref card looks funky. I just can't bring myself to spend a chunk of money on something that isn't pleasing to my eyes.
and here .. https://www.tweaktown.com/news/9302...els-from-asrock-asus-sapphire-more/index.html
Think i'll be getting the 7800XT, probably Sapphire as usually the better AMD partner. Will see how benchmarks look next week but should be a decent upgrade from my 3060Ti which i only got for the NVENC Encoder.
Funny that i have been testing my 5800X3D x264 encoder recently and for streaming with Fast preset @8000kbps it looks better than NVENC.. Hope Twitch adapt AV1 sooner than later, might be sooner since YT added HEVC for streaming and already do AV1.
Nvidia must price high because they think everybody is a streamer and have to pay for AV1 privilege
Last edited:
Wow i never noticed that one
Seems that the RDNA3 stack is finished;
AMD Radeon Chief confirms Radeon RX 7000 (RDNA3) portfolio "is now complete" - VideoCardz.com
Radeon RX 7000 series are complete, confirms Radeon Chief After the Gamescom product announcement, Scott Herkleman (AMD’s Senior Vice President & General Manager Graphics Business Unit) sat down for a quick chat to talk about these products. Yesterday, AMD unveiled its latest additions to the...videocardz.com
weird, cause there is a massive price gap between the 7600 and 7700 and again between 7800 and 7900
7600 to 7700 is the worst, you have to pay almost double to move from a 7600 to 7700 - $249 vs $449
And MLID says the 4060ti is going to get a price cut, so now Nvidia cards will slot into that gap which isn't great for amd
Last edited:
Has to be a 7500 in there at some point
The Sapphire Pulse, having watched a lot of reviews on all sorts of cards these last two years everyone seems to like the Pulse, they are well built with a capable cooler, a good sense no frills inexpensive card.
What happens to the 4060? is that now going to be $199 or is it unlaunched?
Frankly the 4060Ti 8GB needs to be unlaunched and the 4060Ti 16GB to take its place at $299, the 8GB version is just a waste of sand.
What happens to the 4060? is that now going to be $199 or is it unlaunched?
Frankly the 4060Ti 8GB needs to be unlaunched and the 4060Ti 16GB to take its place at $299, the 8GB version is just a waste of sand.
Last edited:
The good news: no Navi 24 successor.Seems that the RDNA3 stack is finished;
AMD Radeon Chief confirms Radeon RX 7000 (RDNA3) portfolio "is now complete" - VideoCardz.com
Radeon RX 7000 series are complete, confirms Radeon Chief After the Gamescom product announcement, Scott Herkleman (AMD’s Senior Vice President & General Manager Graphics Business Unit) sat down for a quick chat to talk about these products. Yesterday, AMD unveiled its latest additions to the...
The bad news: huge gap between the monolith Navi 33 and the chiplets Navi 32.
Due to packaging cost, further cutdown of Navi 32 seems unlikely.
Looks like RDNA3 was badly planned, far less risky would have been two monoliths and chiplet above that.
I'll most likely get the Pulse so that i dont have to move my AIO radiator from the front on my case.. seems i cant fit a triple fan card in my Corsair 400C with it at the front.
Would be nice to go back to an all AMD system again though
The 78 has faster ram and higher memory bandwidth also.