You should have a lot of evidence to prove this then, no?. You will never observe natural selection or mutations evolve one species into another of a higher order,
What a pointless thing to say, of course I wont, it takes
millions of years however there is plenty of evidence to show small mutations/natural selection on a bacterial level. MRSA is just one example that's already been given.
this type of evolution is outside of the scientific method, evolution is assumed to have happened there is no real scientific method of observation that supports this.
Not sure what you mean by "this type of evolution"? There's only one type.
You seem to be saying that because we'll never have a dog giving birth to a rabbit or something equally is implausible, it debunks the whole theory of evolution. In actual fact you're simply misunderstanding it.
Speciation doesn't happen overnight - it's the result of millions of years of tiny imperceptible changes which over time add up.
I'll repost the analogy I used earlier, since it illustrates this perfectly:
You've got 2 lines sheets of paper, each 1km long, you mix up some paint, 1,000,000ml red paint.
Paint the first mm of each sheet of paper red.
Then you mix up some more paint - for the first sheet of paper you mix 999,999ml red, 1ml yellow, and paint the next mm, make some more paint, 999,998ml red, 2ml yellow. Paint the next mm. keep repeating this until you get to 0ml red paint, 1,000,000ml yellow paint.
On the second sheet of paper, instead of yellow paint, you use blue.
Now if you look back over your sheets of paper, you'll see that actually there aren't any "big changes", but it's undeniable that one end of the paper is red, and the other end is yellow/blue.
Of course if you look just at the start and end of the paper, you could easily mistakenly believe that a "big change" has taken place.
Replace red with a common ancestor, blue with a cat and yellow with a dog it's a perfect illustration of how evolution takes place.
