Anyone else had a handwritten letter from the JW recently?

Soldato
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Posts
22,823
Bloodless surgery is becoming more common, perhaps even normal, and even preferable to blood transfusions.

In a few years time the idea of putting somebody else's blood in you might be positively archaic.

There are plenty of medical experts and surgeons advocating for (and practicing) bloodless surgery.

e: Some types of operations were pioneered on JW patients as they actively refuse blood (and have done for decades). However I believe bloodless surgery has been pursued for many years now all over the world, because a blood transfusion is an inherently risky thing.
:eek: :p
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
6,837
Location
Bath
Bloodless surgery is becoming more common, perhaps even normal, and even preferable to blood transfusions.

In a few years time the idea of putting somebody else's blood in you might be positively archaic.

There are plenty of medical experts and surgeons advocating for (and practicing) bloodless surgery.

e: Some types of operations were pioneered on JW patients as they actively refuse blood (and have done for decades). However I believe bloodless surgery has been pursued for many years now all over the world, because a blood transfusion is an inherently risky thing.
The blood thing is personal choice anyone can make that choice not just JW's.

My mum was a pioneer in the field of bloodless surgery, she had the lower 6 vertebrae of her spine fused in the first bloodless operation of its type in Europe. The operation in it's self was a success and the recovery time was halved because it was bloodless. She has since had 9 other operations that were all bloodless (she is falling apart due to arthritis). Hemacil and other non blood volume expanders and oxygenators are available and have been since the early 70's. Blood is dirty no matter how clean the blood banks make it it's still a dirty and cheap way to operate on people.

They own a TV station? Of course they, lets not forget that Religion is also a racket, my mates parents have to pay 10% of their wages to the church, TEN ******* PERCENT xD
Absolutely religion as a whole is a racket, you want to look at money take a peek at the Vatican!

The JW's do not have to give 10% of anything, there is no requirement to do so. A suggested contribution is the same as the tithe that is paid by lots of Catholic, C of E and Muslim people the world over. The tithe suggested by the bible is 10%.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
haha you sound exactly like them, like almost word for word, Foxeye the closet JW, na you're just a bog standard christian right?
I already said I have JWs in my family.

Unsurprisingly I've discussed many things with them and listened to their arguments.

I'm not a JW and they have much higher standards than I do, believe me. To be honest I have nothing but respect for them. They have a level of self-control I could only dream of.

The blood thing is personal choice anyone can make that choice not just JW's.

My mum was a pioneer in the field of bloodless surgery, she had the lower 6 vertebrae of her spine fused in the first bloodless operation of its type in Europe. The operation in it's self was a success and the recovery time was halved because it was bloodless. She has since had 9 other operations that were all bloodless (she is falling apart due to arthritis). Hemacil and other non blood volume expanders and oxygenators are available and have been since the early 70's. Blood is dirty no matter how clean the blood banks make it it's still a dirty and cheap way to operate on people.
@Johno please? ^^

Maybe ditch your preconceptions and do a quick Google about bloodless.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
4 Mar 2008
Posts
2,610
My family have been JWs for over 70 years (grandparents, parents, siblings, uncles, aunts, nephews, nieces … you get the idea). I was one of those children that got shuffled from door to door to try and convert people. My childhood was miserable although my parents and family are lovely.

The same for my wife who I met at a circuit convention

I was a born in and was for 25 years until we managed to fade. We had to fade as we made the mistake of getting baptised as JWs. If we hadn’t been baptised, we could have just left the organisation with little or no hard feelings.

Because we were baptised, we then fell under a certain set of shunning rules that would be applied to us if we left or did something that they disagreed with. The shunning rules are so well enforced that all my and my wife’s family that are JW would no longer have any contact with us until we came back into good standing with the organisation. They would literally not talk to us or our children unless it was something like a family funeral and even then it would be pleasantries that you would expect of someone you might have met once and not a family member.

Imagine that, your family not wanting any contact with you at all unless you became a JW again.

The fade is a loophole which allows you to slowly drift away and becomes a don’t ask don’t tell situation. However, if the organisation was to become aware that I’d started going to a different religion, celebrated birthdays or Christmas or just generally badmouthed the organisation, a judicial committee would be formed and we would be formally expelled (disfellowshipped) from the organisation with all the shunning mentioned above then kicking in.

To clear up some of the questions mentioned and not mentioned in the thread.

JW believe that Armageddon will arrive within a generation of 1914 and the 8 or so billion people that are not JW will be killed at this point. There will then follow a thousand years of peace in paradise on earth until the devil is released again for his last try at corrupting people. The generation policy has had to be adapted several times as somewhat inconveniently the generation that saw 1914 has died off.

Members baptised or not are encouraged to preach whenever they can. They feel it is vital to save people from Armageddon. The people mentioned in this thread that are quiet JW ie, I don’t know my work mate was a JW, I would suggest that those people may have doubts or are uncomfortable with identifying as a JW. Recording of any time spent preaching is kept and collated at the end of the month by the congregation so yes, they are counting their time when they are writing their letters.

Higher education is discouraged. Careers are discouraged. Any research that questions JW doctrine is extremely discourage and can have you labelled as an apostate.

Due to the 2-witness rule, it allows paedophiles and sexual assault to go unpunished. (see Australia Royal Commission but this applies worldwide). Elders will encourage victims to go to the police directly but if they will not, they will not do so themselves despite their knowledge of the allegation.

I appreciate FoxEye may have a different view on this and I respect that but my 55 years of being involved with this organisation leads me to know its is a cult and a dangerous one that tears families apart and wastes / destroys the lives of good people.

If you made it this far, thank you for reading my wall of text!
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Posts
22,823
My family have been JWs for over 70 years (grandparents, parents, siblings, uncles, aunts, nephews, nieces … you get the idea). I was one of those children that got shuffled from door to door to try and convert people. My childhood was miserable although my parents and family are lovely.

The same for my wife who I met at a circuit convention

I was a born in and was for 25 years until we managed to fade. We had to fade as we made the mistake of getting baptised as JWs. If we hadn’t been baptised, we could have just left the organisation with little or no hard feelings.

Because we were baptised, we then fell under a certain set of shunning rules that would be applied to us if we left or did something that they disagreed with. The shunning rules are so well enforced that all my and my wife’s family that are JW would no longer have any contact with us until we came back into good standing with the organisation. They would literally not talk to us or our children unless it was something like a family funeral and even then it would be pleasantries that you would expect of someone you might have met once and not a family member.

Imagine that, your family not wanting any contact with you at all unless you became a JW again.

The fade is a loophole which allows you to slowly drift away and becomes a don’t ask don’t tell situation. However, if the organisation was to become aware that I’d started going to a different religion, celebrated birthdays or Christmas or just generally badmouthed the organisation, a judicial committee would be formed and we would be formally expelled (disfellowshipped) from the organisation with all the shunning mentioned above then kicking in.

To clear up some of the questions mentioned and not mentioned in the thread.

JW believe that Armageddon will arrive within a generation of 1914 and the 8 or so billion people that are not JW will be killed at this point. There will then follow a thousand years of peace in paradise on earth until the devil is released again for his last try at corrupting people. The generation policy has had to be adapted several times as somewhat inconveniently the generation that saw 1914 has died off.

Members baptised or not are encouraged to preach whenever they can. They feel it is vital to save people from Armageddon. The people mentioned in this thread that are quiet JW ie, I don’t know my work mate was a JW, I would suggest that those people may have doubts or are uncomfortable with identifying as a JW. Recording of any time spent preaching is kept and collated at the end of the month by the congregation so yes, they are counting their time when they are writing their letters.

Higher education is discouraged. Careers are discouraged. Any research that questions JW doctrine is extremely discourage and can have you labelled as an apostate.

Due to the 2-witness rule, it allows paedophiles and sexual assault to go unpunished. (see Australia Royal Commission but this applies worldwide). Elders will encourage victims to go to the police directly but if they will not, they will not do so themselves despite their knowledge of the allegation.

I appreciate FoxEye may have a different view on this and I respect that but my 55 years of being involved with this organisation leads me to know its is a cult and a dangerous one that tears families apart and wastes / destroys the lives of good people.

If you made it this far, thank you for reading my wall of text!
Very informative! Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
19,353
Location
South Manchester
It must be driving them mad not being able to go door knocking when everyone is trapped at home.

I work with a JW, really nice fella on the surface but with his family he's so controlling. <snip> I find it bizarre as he's excellent at his job and far from lacking intelligence.

I work with a few, they seem keen on public sector jobs.

My 2p - If it's not a cult, then it's borderline. Purely for the control it wields over otherwise intelligent people.

EDIT : Beaten to it more eloquently by tribz. Good read that!
 
Soldato
Joined
4 Mar 2008
Posts
2,610
Thank you. Without wishing to be dramatic, I debated whether to post in this thread as having my post attributed to me in real life really would have consequences.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
6,837
Location
Bath
Thank you. Without wishing to be dramatic, I debated whether to post in this thread as having my post attributed to me in real life really would have consequences.

I completely know where you are coming from, I had no contact with my parents and brothers for over 10 years as I disassociated myself from the (then local) congregation.

A lot about the JW's has changed in the last few years rules have been relaxed as they have seen a massive drop off in new intake. So much so that my parents are actually doubting what they are being told... My dad is 75 and a life long JW currently and Elder and was once a circuit (district) overseer (think area manager).

My yonger brother has "fallen away" and no longer attends or is interested in the organisation. My.older brother by contrast was Disfellowshiped 35 years ago, but in the last 10 years has gone back (his wife and in-laws are devout JW's).

It's 100% a cult, blinkering people so they cannot see what's really going on around them.
 
Soldato
Joined
17 Aug 2009
Posts
10,733
Imagine that, your family not wanting any contact with you at all unless you became a JW again.

I'd imagine a family withdrawing support for their children would be a major inconvenience unless that child was exceptionally self sufficient and willing to accept losing the family by leaving the religion.

Quite modern and acceptable replacement for belief in hell or corporal punishment to suppress your religion's members who want to be different or simply leave.
 
Soldato
Joined
4 Mar 2008
Posts
2,610
I've removed your username from my quote if you decide to delete.

Thanks, I think I should be ok to leave it up but I appreciate the gesture

I completely know where you are coming from, I had no contact with my parents and brothers for over 10 years as I disassociated myself from the (then local) congregation.

A lot about the JW's has changed in the last few years rules have been relaxed as they have seen a massive drop off in new intake. So much so that my parents are actually doubting what they are being told... My dad is 75 and a life long JW currently and Elder and was once a circuit (district) overseer (think area manager).

Indeed, a lot has changed to try and water it down and make it not so much of a burden for new intakes. I suspect some of the lifers that have seen these changes and also the constant 'new light' doctrine to try fit the timelines may have had their doubts.

The problem is as you know that no outside of the organisation friendships are encouraged so there is no support group for them if they leave. Their whole social structure is built around the members of the congregation who will no longer have any contact with them whatsoever if they decide to leave. That includes immediate and close family and it’s a massive pressure to apply to someone.

Source should anyone want to know more about disfellowshipping / disassociation.
 
Soldato
Joined
4 Mar 2008
Posts
2,610
Oh, I forgot to mention that one of the reasons for the letters is that its their annual memorial of Jesus' death next Saturday so activity increases in the run up to this so anyone interested can be invitited to attend.
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Posts
4,694
Location
Wiltshire
I already said I have JWs in my family.

I didn't see that, I could just tell from the tone of your posts.

Read Tribz post above? Maybe you should take it in ya know, open your mind a bit because all religion is an absolute disgrace regardless of what form it comes in, it infects the mind like a disease and is responsible for child abuse, misery and death on a daily basis.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
I didn't see that, I could just tell from the tone of your posts.

Read Tribz post above? Maybe you should take it in ya know, open your mind a bit because all religion is an absolute disgrace regardless of what form it comes in, it infects the mind like a disease and is responsible for child abuse, misery and death on a daily basis.
The convo you and I were having was solely about bloodless surgery. I think the point is, you shouldn't disregard bloodless surgery because it's something JWs do.

Take everything on its own merit. Could bloodless surgery actually be useful/beneficial? Regardless of any religious association? Turns out, yes, it can.

Btw people can have whatever view of the JWs they like, that's their prerogative. My having family members who are JWs just gives me a bit of an insight into their beliefs and their organisation, and what I see doesn't strike me as anything to be fearful of or strongly opposed to. It works for them and they really don't seem to be hurting anyone.

The only thing I will do here is to correct inaccuracies where I see them.
 
Back
Top Bottom