Assange to go!

VincentHanna said:
Yep

Remember all those times he was going to release some massively damning dirt on Hilary Clinton during the Presidential campaign - And then it was just a press conference of him waffling for hours about nothing.
Click to expand...

Gosh, I forget, remind me who it was that was on the edge of their seat every time one of these announcements was made, beside themselves with excitement, desperately waiting for the 'revelation' that was going to show everyone they were wrong and the reddit CT nuts were right ?
 
LOL, enough now. This is about Assange not Manning, the earlier reference to Manning was in respect of his sentence not his gender.

Ah man. You people. Freakin' hillarious at times.
 
Terminal_Boy said:
Nope, I worked for a network operator for 7 years and know what's possible on the various core network elements if you have full admin access.
Click to expand...

It's possible to fake text messages and other evidence, yes. Just like it's possible for someone to be extradited to the USA.

But what you're alleging is that some person or group secretly faked text messages and other evidence, i.e. it is you who is openly alleging that a conspiracy is in operation. Not me. You. It's not a secret that the USA wants Assange taken to the USA for a secret trial. That's openly acknowledged by the USA. So it's not a conspiracy. Unlike your claim of secretly faked evidence, which is a conspiracy.
 
Julian Assange will continue to face detention if he leaves the Ecuadorian embassy in London after a British judge upheld a warrant for his arrest.

Handing down her judgement before a packed courtroom at Westminster magistrates court, senior district judge Emma Arbuthnot said she was not persuaded by the argument from Assange’s legal team that it was not in the public interest to pursue him for skipping bail.

She said: “I find arrest is a proportionate response even though Mr Assange has restricted his own freedom for a number of years.

“Defendants on bail up and down the country, and requested persons facing extradition, come to court to face the consequences of their own choices. He should have the courage to do the same. It is certainly not against the public interest to proceed.”
Click to expand...
Good news. The guy is an arrogant self-righteous creep. If he didn't sexually assault one or more women in Sweden he should have the guts to defend himself in court.

I pity the Ecuadorian Embassy staff who have had to put up with him all these years.
 
Freakbro said:
Not much of a "secret trial" if they openly acknowledge it, is it
Click to expand...

It is a well known secret trial, only it is not known unless you wear your tinfoil hat. The USA are paranoid that Assange will let out secrets about Area 51 and S4 that he suggested to his followers years ago.
 
Freakbro said:
Not much of a "secret trial" if they openly acknowledge it, is it
Click to expand...

It's not impossible or even unusual for a thing to be secret without its existence being secret. For example, I know you have a password to log on to these forums. I don't know what it is. The password is secret. Its existence is not.

No tinfoil hat required. But feel free to borrow one of skookum's if you like.
 
Angilion said:
It's not impossible or even unusual for a thing to be secret without its existence being secret. For example, I know you have a password to log on to these forums. I don't know what it is. The password is secret. Its existence is not.

No tinfoil hat required. But feel free to borrow one of skookum's if you like.
Click to expand...

So you mean in camera rather than a secret trial
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom