Hello guys,
I'm new around here. On Saturday i received my monitor ( did not buy it through OUK), it is working well and i like it quite a lot. However while surfing through this thread i noticed another guy had an issue with monitor bleeding.
I decided to do a similar test and this is what I have:
http://imgur.com/1dEtUnh,P23aren,HzEqx1e,Tp0vP7I#0
http://imgur.com/1dEtUnh,P23aren,HzEqx1e,Tp0vP7I#1
http://imgur.com/1dEtUnh,P23aren,HzEqx1e,Tp0vP7I#2
http://imgur.com/1dEtUnh,P23aren,HzEqx1e,Tp0vP7I#3
So far while I've been gaming, watching videos or regular use I have not come across any noticeable bleeding. It is only visible when doing the above test.
My question is; Do you think it is appropiate to ask for a replacement?
Thanks in advance
Very tempted to order one today. But anyone know what is OcUK's stance for return? If it has excessive IPS glow, backlight leak etc, would they arrange courier to pick it up and replace it, or do we have to deal with Asus?
Also am I right to assume that the current batch that OcUK is selling has the latest firmware?
I wish OcUK provide service of testing the monitors before sending them outThey can't force you to deal with ASUS as long as you notify them within the 14-day 'cooling off' period that you wish to return the product under CCR (Consumer Contract Regulations). I don't believe OcUK would arrange the courier, though. You would have to do that yourself if you aren't returning it because it is faulty. And be very careful - what you class as 'faulty' may not be what they or the manufacturers class as faulty.
So, given the excitement surrounding the Fury/Fury X, is this going to be the best monitor to pair it with, or are there any other models yet to be released worth waiting for?
It depends what you're after. There will be a number of 'FreeSync' models launched over the coming months, some of which are not currently in the public eye. There are several '4K' UHD models which could work nicely with such GPUs, but if you're after high refresh rates and FreeSync then the MG279Q is looking like a nice choice.
You can actually try running 2560x1440 on VSR with the 290, to give you an exact idea how your 290 will handle that res rather than guessing.
You'd be surprised how well would the 290 handle 2560 res, with the exception of may be Crysis 3, and some Nvidia titles.
The use of AA for 2560 res is NOT really an absolute necessity.
This is so true it's not funny. We really do need a hall of shame thread sticky thread to give the "big time monitor" vendors a boot up the arse. I mean if the Korean builders can build, QC and indivdually ship guaranteed QC perfect screens at a 3rd of the price why can the big firms...
Mine also coming tomorrow, so I'm hoping you'll get one more experience how MG279Q is great
Just took delivery of one of these. Been using it for all of two hours, but some very quick thoughts. No photos yet.
Initial impression is that I may have got a lemon. Image quality out of the box is horrible compared to the BL3200PT I normally use. The screen has a noticeable green cast to it and whites are 'creamy' rather than pure white. I haven't been able to completely dial out either issue using the OSD so far. Contrast and black depth are good for an IPS, but again very inferior to what I'm used to. There's also a dead pixel right in the centre of the screen.
The monitor seems to be highly temperamental. I've been getting numerous 'Link Failure' messages when running at 144Hz, both with the included DP cable and two others I have to hand. I swapped round my pair of 290s to eliminate a card issue, but the problem persists. Oh, and I'm pretty sure this 'new' monitor is used. The box looked to have been opened and resealed with tape and the bag covering the monitor was crumpled and had obviously been handled
On the plus side Freesync, even limited to 90Hz, works wonderfully. The extra smoothness is really impressive.
But right now I don't think Freesync is enough to make up for the MG279Q's problems.