• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

ATI cuts 6950 allocation

I don't like the sound of 1536 shaders. At 1920 I was considering replacing my GTX580 but I think 1536 (even if thet are very efficient little buggers) will need to work very very hard. Less shaders than 5800 sounds like ATI have cut costs and used efficiency changes to make up the performance. 1920 shaders implies they have beefed up existing hardware and added additional efficiences on top. More soldiers with bigger guns are better than less soldiers with bigger guns.

So there you go. 1920 and I will probably buy, 1536 and a most probably won't.
 
Last edited:
Yea i'm thinking with 1920 shaders it would be a final hurrah for the 40nm process so they are giving us something special to tide us over.

We shall see in a few days.
 
As others have stated it just doesnt make sense for amd to make a card (6970) that is only 35 percent faster than the 6870. So a 6950 is only going to be 15-20 percent faster than amds mid range card? thats abunch of hog wash.

Yeah, personally I think the 6970 will be faster than the 580 by 10-20% or even more if raven is right :p as it really wouldn't make much sense for them to bring out a slower card, but then as has been mentioned before AMD/ATI target is to produce cards for a better price to performance, noise and heat etc. and plus the fact that these cards are using different architecture and also the fact that the 6870 is on par with the 5870 (which leads me to think that it will be faster) as opposed to the refresh of the 480, which IMO should have been the 485 not the 580.

But at the end of the day, if it doesn't and it is priced a lot cheaper than the 580 and has the other important factors better than the 580 like noise etc. then in my books that declares the 6970 the winner for all round features like performance/price, quiet card etc. which to me is more important than just having sheer performance. However everyone will have different requirements to what I want.

It matters because these cards have been hyped up so much that everyone anticipate a Ferminator. There is no guarentee that 6970 will have better cooling or be quieter than the GTX580, you only need to look as for as 6800 vs GTX460 to see that. The coolers on the 5x0 cards are actually most impressive, much better than anything ATI has produced so far.

I tend to buy whatever top dog card is out at the time. If the 6970 is best I will get one, if GTX580 is best it will save me the bother.

edit: There is also slight reluctance on my part to purchase a £350-£400 card that costs half as much to produce as a similar £400 card which I already own. I feel that NVidia "virtually" provides better value for money.

For one, these rumors that have been spreading saying that they will be a lot faster than the 580, has been from us lot and others (mostly ATI fanboys) and ravens source :p, not from AMD or any other official sources.

There is no guarantee that it will, but generally AMD/ATI cards have always been the better choice for people like me who want a card that is quieter, less power consumption and less heat produced than what nvidia have offered.

Also there isn't a massive difference between the 460 and the 68xx cards, the 460 according to some reviews is better at those factors than the 6870 but in some other reviews the 6870 is claimed to be better than the 460. Either way I would be happy with the 460 or 6870 as there both good cards considering the price, the difference isn't that big to sway me over to either a 460 or 6870.

Yeah, that comes down to personal preference in the end and also if people need eyefinity or physx or whatever a certain card can do that the other can't and also the brand they prefer, personally for me I don't care, whatever fills my needs the best for the money that I am willing to spend whether it be a nvidia or an AMD card.

I am not bothered either about 3D, eyefinity, physx etc.

The cards, which I am/will be considering to get will either be a 6950, 6870, 460 or a 570 and if they do bring one out, a 560 :p
 
Last edited:
I'm quite pleased with this news, I have just managed to save up £300 ready for launch as I want a card for eyefinity as an upgrade to my 260 (216), the chances of the 6970 coming in at around that price have just got a lot better.

I wish Nvidia would offer something similar to eyefinity so I had more choice (i.e single-card 3 monitor spanning for gaming).
 
Last edited:
I'm quite pleased with this news, I have just managed to save up £300 ready for launch as I want a card for eyefinity as an upgrade to my 260 (216), the chances of the 6970 coming in at around that price have just got a lot better.

I wish Nvidia would offer something similar to eyefinity so I had more choice (i.e single-card 3 monitor spanning for gaming).

Do the 480s/etc not have 3 outputs? That's kind of sucky if so as I was going to consider moving to a 480/580 if the prices were right and the 69xx series didn't turn out how I wanted it to.
 
Ah well - will have to be some awesome deal on mid-high range cards to tempt me back to Nvidia then I guess :)

gibbo said he was gonna do some silly deals on some 3 bar electric fires,.. erm i mean gtx480's :D ,, send one to an eskimo and youl be giving them hawaii
 
Last edited:
I thought it was well known that you need SLI for surround vision....

Anyway AMD own Nvidia in this department when AMD can do it from one card, looks to me like Nvidia are just trying to squeeze more cash out of the consumer forcing them to buy another GPU. The 6970 with 2GB of ram will be great for it as long as you are willing to turn some IQ settings down in demanding titles.
 
/snip

For one, these rumors that have been spreading saying that they will be a lot faster than the 580, has been from us lot and others (mostly ATI fanboys) and ravens source :p, not from AMD or any other official sources.

/snip

my sauce was very official thank you. They also have 56 other varieties' of sauce too.

seriously though my friend works for Sapphire and was 100% correct with his info on the 5870 release and i trust him on this too. But with everything else we will have to wait and see. There is only one person on this forum who knows 100% and thats Gibbo as he has been testing one all week.
 
you might want to edit that - i'm sure your mate wouldn't be too happy if he lost his job for leaking info...

nice to know though - i'd probably get one of those if they're going to be a competitive as Gibbo's making out
 
Well I'm still up for it being faster than a 580 but even if it's not AMD will price it way below the 580 and rely on their 6990 to take the fastest card on the planet crown which they still currently hold lol, this will obviously destroy the 580. Nvidia still have no answer to the 5970 let alone the 6990 and I think AMD are not bothered about taking the fastest single GPU when they can develop dual GPU cards that Nvidia currently can't combat.

Well, well, you dont seem so sure of your self ravenxxx2? Your "source" may be fud after all? :rolleyes:
 
I thought it was well known that you need SLI for surround vision....

Anyway AMD own Nvidia in this department when AMD can do it from one card, looks to me like Nvidia are just trying to squeeze more cash out of the consumer forcing them to buy another GPU. The 6970 with 2GB of ram will be great for it as long as you are willing to turn some IQ settings down in demanding titles.

I was aware that was the case previously but I thought they might have remedied it with the 580s/etc.

My 5870 does an okay job at eyefinity with details turned down - what I am hoping for is a card that can do a better job.
 
I thought it was well known that you need SLI for surround vision....

Anyway AMD own Nvidia in this department

Well, that depends:

AMD have the functionality advantage (they can run three screens with a single GPU), but nvidia's solution offers far, far better performance at the moment. See, for example the HardOCP review of nvidia surround vs eyefinity:

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2010/07/20/nvidia_surround_technology_performance_review/

hardocp said:
GeForce GTX 480 SLI is a powerhouse of performance at high resolution multi-display gaming. In every game we played it didn’t just come out on top a little, it completely owned the two HD 5870 CrossFireX setups.


I'm hoping that this is something which AMD have improved with the 6900 series. As a high-res multi-screen gamer, I need two high powered GPUs to get a reasonable framerate, and AMD is not an option unless multi-GPU multi-screen performance is improved.
 
Back
Top Bottom