Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
gibbo what drivers are you testing with
I am sure Gibbo would love to confirm figures but he obviously cannot. Within 5 minutes men in black suits wearing small AMD logos will make him disappear. Alternatively, false accusations about him mollesting a graphics card will appear and he will be extradited to Canada for punishment.
10.11 (ones in the box with the card!)
Note! AMD Catalyst™ 10.11 does not provide support for the AMD Radeon™ HD 68xx series of graphics cards. Full support for these graphics cards is targeted to be available in the AMD Catalyst 10.12 driver release.
I am sure Gibbo would love to confirm figures but he obviously cannot. Within 5 minutes of breaking the NDA, men in black suits wearing small AMD logos will make him disappear. Alternatively, false accusations about him mollesting a graphics card will appear and he will be extradited to Canada for punishment.
Stop dreaming about 10.12 drivers guys. AMD had enough time to tailor the boxed driver to these cards before launch, so any performance gains will be minimal.
Canada!? thats bit harsh!
ps
Also since these cards are "rubbish" I presume they are going to be around the 300-350 mark?
If this card comes in at a cracking price which it should then it's a great card.
It is strange that 6900 has only made minor gains within most benchmarks apart from Heaven. It seems very perculiar when you consider that the cores ate ~15% larger, memory bandwidth is ~15% greater (and ther is twice as much of it), and all of those supposed optimations that 6900 is said to deliver.