My issue is that they've taken a game that was RTwP, and made it TB. I don't dislike TB, but I
much prefer RTwP. I can understand your feeling of them making a D&D game and making it RTwP. That said, they had BG, BG2, IWD, IWD2, NWN and NWN2 which were all, IIRC, RTwP, so it's not like they didn't set a trend themselves.
Larian knows TB games, and they've had AFAIK good success with DOS and DOS2, so them to basically come in and make BG3 but more DOS:BG seems a bit eh. I'm not sure why they didn't choose to make their own BG spinoff game - ala Dark Alliance, it's a BG game but not BG - instead of continuing on the main game. I wonder if people felt the same with Fallout 3.
Hopefully the game will be good, it looks like it's shaping up to be so, I may try it at some point. I'd probably agree with
@spudbynight, it's harder to make a game that does both RTwP and TB good than just one good and I'd rather Larian do BG3 justice and it be good than them hammer in RTwP and **** it up.