They're not associated with bad games, just games that run poorly on PC with or without their association. I won't stoop to speculating the terms of a contract I have no knowledge of, it's clear you've already made a decision without any knowledge of it yourself.
Bottom line is they're not developing the games. I am now going to play the game in question, because it's actually quite enjoyable, bye![]()
Well you should have worked out that i meant runs badly as i said that in the second instance.
Yes the bottom line is that they are not developing the games and the only one trying to hold NV accountable for the games was Kaapstad but you keep replying to me as if i was agreeing with him when i clearly was not.
But im am holding them accountable for there association of badly running games and the stunt with the physx video and maybe its because of all the preorders on the PC version and the NV sponsorship money if we out source it to a cheap development team and give them only 8 weeks which saves even more money because time is money we can turned a profit on the PC version even before release so lets just chuck it out there seeing that the real bread and butter was the console versions.
The contract really does not matter when NV priority is not but about well running games but promotion of the GPU brand, just plaster it on everything they can.
I will be buying the game if they fix it and when its got all the DLC, just like i have with all the other Batman games.
Last edited: