• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Batman™: Arkham Knight Performance

Boomstick777 said:
^^ At least someone enjoys 30 FPS then.

I'll wait until it works properly on PC. Until then it's another game for PS4.

Saying that I'm likely going to get Fury X, so it makes sense to have this on console as will no doubt be extra gimped for AMD on PC.

From now on at least I know the score.

AAA + Gameworks, means will run better on console for launch.

Still only downloaded 14GB on PSN, my PS4 DL speed is really slow today. Can't win lol.
Click to expand...

I wouldnt support a game dev on any system if they pull this kind of crap. Im glad i got the game for free, yet i would rather have another copy of Witcher 3 to give away as that game is atleast playable now.

opethdisciple said:
It sounds like they locked it to 30 fps for a reason. Shoddy performance, slightly negated by locking at 30 fps.
Click to expand...

Ive read something about physics going nuts at times if the game is not locked to 30.. I guess the only way to have just a tiny amount of fun is to use a controller then ..cause 30 fps just stinks on mouse/keyboard.
 
Wizzfizz said:
It must really kill people inside that spend thousands on upgrades, to then be fed rubbish like this
Click to expand...

Phixsator said:
I wouldnt support a game dev on any system if they pull this kind of crap. Im glad i got the game for free, yet i would rather have another copy of Witcher 3 to give away as that game is atleast playable now.



Ive read something about physics going nuts at times if the game is not locked to 30.. I guess the only way to have just a tiny amount of fun is to use a controller then ..cause 30 fps just stinks on mouse/keyboard.
Click to expand...

Yep big disappointment. Been looking forward to this one. No in game 60 FPS.. Lol they are having a laugh.

It just seems like another game that's better on console. I'm guessing the Dev's took that Gameworks money and ran. I really don't think they care about PC. Gameworks + 30 FPS is all the proof you need.

This will be a great game on PS4 (When it eventually downloads :p).

As I'm likely going Fury X, it makes sense to have it on PS4 anyway, as gimping with gameworks will no doubt tank even Fury X performance on PC.

Maybe I'll get it on PC next year when it's on a Steam sale :p In time for the Pascal Titan, that card might actually be able to run it properly :D:p
 
Yawn, didn't play the other 2 games (mainly 'cause of GFWL then forgot about them) but was thinking of giving them a chance now that the 3rd is coming out. Guess I'll have to pass. At the end of the day devs wouldn't keep ****ing up their release if people wouldn't give them a pass & paid regardless.
 
Poneros said:
Yawn, didn't play the other 2 games (mainly 'cause of GFWL then forgot about them) but was thinking of giving them a chance now that the 3rd is coming out. Guess I'll have to pass. At the end of the day devs wouldn't keep ****ing up their release if people wouldn't give them a pass & paid regardless.
Click to expand...

Trying to be smug didnt work, Arkham City was fine on release
 
The highest available texture detail is "normal"? Where is the "Insane" or "Fade touched"? Low, normal, high, very high, baterang?

I thought it was mandatory to have a 'stupidly-named top setting that looks the same as high'?
 
borley said:
Shame the benchmark is nowhere near the game performance
Click to expand...

I'm really unimpressed with the game performance - especially when driving. The first two were great games, and this has a really promising story and great gameplay from the beginning. I just can't bring myself to play any more until performance is fixed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom