Batman™: Arkham Knight Performance

[Nexus18]

Well that is how advertising works.

You pay someone to have your logo on it.

Well good luck trying to tell lamb chop that

 

[K1LaW8tt5]

Answer this one simple question - who has the the final say when a game goes gold? Or as an equal example where were AMD when Battlefield 4 was released in a hot state?

Bf4 did not release with mantle so no amd tech in the game when released. Also most problems were in multiplayer not singleplayer.

Batman released with thrown together gameworks libs and is singleplayer only.

Cannot compare really

 

[Silent_Scone]

Bf4 did not release with mantle so no amd tech in the game when released. Also most problems were in multiplayer not singleplayer.

Batman released with thrown together gameworks libs and is singleplayer only.

Cannot compare really

Lol of course not, how stupid of me. Can't compete with that.

 

[Gregster]

Not really wishing to get in this petty argument but a fair point on BF4.... I played Wednesday nights on TS with MLG and it was quite shocking the amount of crashing for all of us, regardless of vendor and the blame was directed to Dice and EA.

Batman runs well for me on AMD and Nvidia though, so do I praise Nvidia or the Devs or WB?

 

[Klunt Bumskrint]

Who should make this statement - Iron Galaxy?

Who ever is responsible

 

[oldestgregg]

8GB system ram, which is the issue. Runs at around 5.5GB+. But as I understand it, up to as you say 12/13gb, it will just take all it can have.

Dont get how he could have a problem with it when Im managing just fine with 8gb. It uses 6.1gb of vram but system ram seems fine and the only stutter I get is some batmobile parts

 

[barrylindon]

Okay can someone point me to a gaming evolved title that had to be retired from sale, or that had a 70% negative reviews, even dirt rally wich is an early access title ran better than most nvidia "the way is meant to be played" games.

Nvidia as a graphic card maker brilliant, best in the business

as a game optimizer LOL

 

[Stanners]

Okay can someone point me to a gaming evolved title that had to be retired from sale, or that had a 70% negative reviews, even dirt rally wich is an early access title ran better than most nvidia "the way is meant to be played" games.

Nvidia as a graphic card maker brilliant, best in the business

as a game optimizer LOL

And they start arriving.....

 

[LambChop]

Well good luck trying to tell lamb chop that

I take it the expression 'Time is money' is something you have not heard of ?

 

[Silent_Scone]

And they start arriving.....

I know, right?

It's at least insightful into peoples understanding of how games development works. Or lack of. I wouldn't blame AMD for a game being poorly optimised under their sponsorship. Although namely there aren't many games to speak of, and even less of those that incorporate their in house tech

 

[LambChop]

I love how Nvidia are a game optimizer now. Not engineers assisting and recommending how to incorporate their libraries into games, but actual games optimizers lol.

I take it Nvidia gets all the praise for the Borderlands series, not Gearbox ?

 

[barrylindon]

And they start arriving.....

I arrived in 1989 with an epson with an mccga graphic card, but yeah whatever.

 

[Nexus18]

AMD have a good amount of sponsored games (exclude GTA) with more coming in future

http://www.amd.com/en-us/markets/game/featured/all-games

In fact, I don't think there are that many more gameworks games, from a quick look and what I know of, we have; witcher 3, watch dogs, killing floor 2, assasins creed, far cry 4, batman AK and AO, metro (can't remember if all games have phsyx/gameworks?)

I take it the expression 'Time is money' is something you have not heard of ?

Ok then, lets say nvidia "time is money" is true.... then what about AMD and their sponsored games? Remember all the times you asked Matt something along the lines of "so then how much did AMD pay for this developer to use mantle?" I guess the same must apply to AMD then, "time is money", right?

EDIT:

And here is an example:

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=27239320&postcount=92

 

[Gregster]

Rainow six - Assassin's Creed Syndicate - The Division are 3 from the top of my head.

 

[Bonjour]

Less semantics.

More Arkham Knight performance.

 

[drunkenmaster]

AS I've pointed out before Lambchop uses the same examples to prove and disprove the same point over and over again. His reasoning is, AMD paid for BF4 thus AMD paid for Mantle... Nvidia paid for all the gameworks games thus they don't pay for Gameworks.

 

[Klunt Bumskrint]

Why is this thread turning into a biznitch fight

 

[tayto_0]

Why is this thread turning into a biznitch fight

Shh! let them to it! It's fun reading when you don't care about the subject and are not involved

 

[LambChop]

AMD have a good amount of sponsored games (exclude GTA) with more coming in future

http://www.amd.com/en-us/markets/game/featured/all-games

In fact, I don't think there are that many more gameworks games, from a quick look and what I know of, we have; witcher 3, watch dogs, killing floor 2, assasins creed, far cry 4, batman AK and AO, metro (can't remember if all games have phsyx/gameworks?)



Ok then, lets say nvidia "time is money" is true.... then what about AMD and their sponsored games? Remember all the times you asked Matt something along the lines of "so then how much did AMD pay for this developer to use mantle?" I guess the same must apply to AMD then, "time is money", right?

EDIT:

And here is an example:

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=27239320&postcount=92

I would gladly hold my hands up to that had AMD actually developed Mantle, but thats a different story. Ask me anything else you like but I'm not going to get into another Mantle debate.

 

[Silent_Scone]

Only they didn't they took people onboard that pitched it to them who were from OpenCL background