The release notes say something along the lines of not working currently but they're working with amd and nvidia to sort it out.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Batman™: Arkham Knight Performance
- Thread starter tommybhoy
- Start date
The release notes say something along the lines of not working currently but they're working with amd and nvidia to sort it out.
Associate
I wonder what the chances are of getting the other games added if you got your copy of Arkham Knight with a Nvidia card, I already have all the other games on steam, except for city which I have a physical copy of, wouldn't mind it appearing on my steam library though, I fancy another play through.
The games will almost certainly just be added automatically to the account of anybody with Arkham Knight in their library by the specified date. They're not going to be looking through purchases and such. The only exception might be if the Nvidia giveaway version of the game has a completely different AppID, but I doubt that's the case.
Soldato
Soldato
I played this near launch with a GTX 960 @ 1080P and thought it ran pretty well at normal settings tbh, looked better than console because of AA etc. Ran really well on a 980 Ti @ 1080P / 1440P.
I wander if people are trying to run this maxed out on a 950 @ 1080P, or maxed out on something less than a 980 Ti @ 1440P+. That would explain the performance issues. Just drop the settings a tad..
I wander if people are trying to run this maxed out on a 950 @ 1080P, or maxed out on something less than a 980 Ti @ 1440P+. That would explain the performance issues. Just drop the settings a tad..
Caporegime
I see issues with certain cards and SLI/XF to be fixed.
Again, I thought this was a Gameworks issue ?
Soldato
If CD project can implement Gameworks in TW3 then the blame is with the developer not the tech used.
If the tech was fundamentally broken dev after dev, AAA after AAA would not continue to use it.
If the tech was fundamentally broken dev after dev, AAA after AAA would not continue to use it.
They most likely get paid to use it just like AMD pay EA/DICE for their "sponsored" titles.
It is funny though how every game that has gameworks seems to be game breaking buggy... where as the majority of AMD's sponsored games run without any serious problems with the exception of BF 4
If it is the developers fault then why are nvidia letting them use their tech. in broken games... also, what about all those people that go on about how nvidia work closely with the developers to get the best experience for nvidia/PC gamers, surely with all these buggy titles lately, that theory has gone right out the door?
Last edited:
Permabanned
I'm pretty sure I was on a 290x when it released and it was unplayable when it came to car chases with big pauses and stutter. I gave it a try on my Fury last night and it gave a smooth 50-60 fps maxed out at 1440 via vsr on a 1080p screen so this is back on my "Need to get around to playing it" list again.
Good news.
I put it up to 4k via vsr but it ran in the high 20's which is a no go, It doesn't matter though I usually play at 1440 so I'm happy I was just interested in how it would do.
Good news.
I put it up to 4k via vsr but it ran in the high 20's which is a no go, It doesn't matter though I usually play at 1440 so I'm happy I was just interested in how it would do.
Last edited:
Soldato
Does it work yet?
They most likely get paid to use it just like AMD pay EA/DICE for their "sponsored" titles.
It is funny though how every game that has gameworks seems to be game breaking buggy... where as the majority of AMD's sponsored games run without any serious problems with the exception of BF 4
Exactly.
Eventually the realism will sink in that the devs don't actually make the decisions on what's included to make their job 'easier', it's decided for them with a big fat cheque.
If it truly made life easier, every single upcoming title would include GW's code.
Soldato
Whoever it is, it's way too obvious 
OT: Pre-patch, I had everything maxed @1440p with or without GW, using adaptive v-sync and it held a solid 60fps. Now, it's fairly solid, but there are noticeable drops to 40-50fps here and there when flying around.
Still does that random crash that you posted in the other thread, Nexus. That's the bigger issue for me anyway.
Does anyone else find the cutscenes a little juddery? It's always been like that for me.
OT: Pre-patch, I had everything maxed @1440p with or without GW, using adaptive v-sync and it held a solid 60fps. Now, it's fairly solid, but there are noticeable drops to 40-50fps here and there when flying around.
Still does that random crash that you posted in the other thread, Nexus. That's the bigger issue for me anyway.
Does anyone else find the cutscenes a little juddery? It's always been like that for me.
Man of Honour
Looks visually worse to me.
SLI support is rubbish too.
TWIMTBP lol.
SLI support is rubbish too.
TWIMTBP lol.
Turning on the GimpWorks features still cripples performance, yes. Here demonstrated on a GTX 970 running at 1515/7850:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVemnv_LCf8
GW on: 30 min, 89 max, 61fps average
GW off: 70 min, 132 max, 96fps average
A 36.46% performance hit and minimums more than halved for some smoke and bits of paper flying around. Thank you based Nvidia.
Caporegime
^ Thats hilarious that