• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Batman™: Arkham Knight Performance

whyscotty said:
Game does Work:)
Click to expand...

These forums are a strange bunch. People moaning about things and when you ask them what problems they are getting, they just carry on moaning about things. If they list what issues they are getting there is possibly a fix for them but nobody seems to want to list anything and instead whine a lot.
 
Heisenberg said:
I think what they are saying is the PC port was out sourced to a different company and rocksteady concentrated on the console versions.
Click to expand...

It was, it was Iron Galaxy, they also co-created the abortion known as Arkham Origins for the PC too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Galaxy_Studios

Console gamers have gotten the Rocksteady treatment, PC gamers got the backwards clowns at IG. Wonderful. IG make very little that isn't at least in someway fundamentally broken.
 
Nobody Dies said:
These forums are a strange bunch. People moaning about things and when you ask them what problems they are getting, they just carry on moaning about things. If they list what issues they are getting there is possibly a fix for them but nobody seems to want to list anything and instead whine a lot.
Click to expand...

I asked about the Vram underclocking pages back, but no-one pays any attention.

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=28215108&postcount=48

I think this game is torturing Vram in it's present state.
 
pgi947 said:
It was, it was Iron Galaxy, they also co-created the abortion known as Arkham Origins for the PC too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Galaxy_Studios

Console gamers have gotten the Rocksteady treatment, PC gamers got the backwards clowns at IG. Wonderful. IG make very little that isn't at least in someway fundamentally broken.
Click to expand...

Do you feel like you are part of the master race :D:D:D:D:D
 
Such graphical tour de forces litter their back catalogue as Scribblenauts Remix for iThings and Ms. Splosion Man on Windows Phone 7.

What's next? Zynga doing the port for Deus Ex 4?
 
TheRealDeal said:
Do you feel like you are part of the master race :D:D:D:D:D
Click to expand...

Oh big time, I do like how changing graphical settings, does, well, nothing to FPS, like its not even applying. 780SLI

All on opening scene of the bench:

Full max 1440 = 56fps
Full max 1440 NO AA = 60fps
LOD at normal, NO AA, 1440 = 61fps.

The only thing that changes is GPU utilisation, one card go's from 98% on full max down to 78% with the lower LOD.

Edit: The game doesn't close either, it just kind of crashes once its closed. Brilliant. Someone from IG and Rocksteady should be nominated to be shot at dawn.

Golf clap for this ****.
 
Last edited:
wazza300 said:
who do they employ for game testing? Mr.Magoo/Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles?
Click to expand...

The same reviewers for the ps4 i think. I'm still getting over the ps4 review which said even with a few pop ups, texture glitches and fps dropping to 26 fps in first act and the batmobile falling through the gamefloor, that its laudable that they have done such a good job and made such a bug free game. Seriously? Are ps4 players more easily satisfied than pc players?

Or is it just me?
 
Given the state of just the benchmark, I'd happily swap a car falling through the floor and the odd texture pop for sub par performance, **** poor SLI scaling and throws up an error message when exiting.

62FPS average at 1440, maxed with all gameworks disabled (you need to do this to get MSI OSD to show, neat huh?) with average GPU utlisation of 75%, CPU utilisation of 3 threads at 20%.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom