Battalion 1944 (ww2 game )

Twirlywoos said:
are you two singing from the same hymn sheet?

If pb is used then there better be a better sla put in place. Otherwise they need to find a better anti cheat service whatever that may be. Having nothing at all is signing their own death wish and having a mediocre anti cheat service is just a ticking bomb.
Click to expand...

Anti-cheat software are only as good as each other when they've been updated to tackle the cheats at that time.

Which one would you recommend? Guaranteed there will still be cheaters.

Regardless, the best way to tackle cheaters is having active admins.
 
Swifty55 said:
Anti-cheat software are only as good as each other when they've been updated to tackle the cheats at that time.

Which one would you recommend? Guaranteed there will still be cheaters.

Regardless, the best way to tackle cheaters is having active admins.
Click to expand...

Agreed, think he one of those guys who thinks better anti cheat software can just be magicked out.

There is not a person who does not want better anti cheat software, but most of us realise that stamping our feet wont make it happen.
 
IM IN !! if it is anything like Day of Defeat then its a winner for me. I spent so many hours on DoD. Used to play it on a dial up connection with a p100 haha, Never found a FPS that has come close to how i felt about DoD so fingers crossed that this game will
 
Swifty55 said:
Anti-cheat software are only as good as each other when they've been updated to tackle the cheats at that time.

Which one would you recommend? Guaranteed there will still be cheaters.

Regardless, the best way to tackle cheaters is having active admins.
Click to expand...

Again I repeat Punkbuster is ****. I've already said what other ones there are.

I've reported so many players and email [email protected] all the time yet all I get is the same generic crappy reply "we'll investigate"

I have been reporting players since last quarter 2015 and these people are still not banned. :rolleyes:

Now you can all can judge for yourself whether these guys below are cheating or not. But having active cheaters running riot in a game is not acceptable several months after the have been reported. Admins cannot dedicate their lives 24/7 to watching servers and will there even be a stats engine behind this game to determine who is just a skilled players vs a cheater.

https://www.247fairplay.com/CheatDetector/Papazipfel
https://www.247fairplay.com/CheatDetector/RenownedRenegade
https://www.247fairplay.com/CheatDetector/himic754
https://www.247fairplay.com/CheatDetector/Tem****ed

There are many more in my emails but I am not going to list everyone as I haven't got all day.

I accept that there are cheaters in video games but if this game is Steam only then VAC would be a good start
 
Twirlywoos said:
Again I repeat Punkbuster is ****. I've already said what other ones there are.

I've reported so many players and email [email protected] all the time yet all I get is the same generic crappy reply "we'll investigate"

I have been reporting players since last quarter 2015 and these people are still not banned. :rolleyes:

Now you can all can judge for yourself whether these guys below are cheating or not. But having active cheaters running riot in a game is not acceptable several months after the have been reported. Admins cannot dedicate their lives 24/7 to watching servers and will there even be a stats engine behind this game to determine who is just a skilled players vs a cheater.

https://www.247fairplay.com/CheatDetector/Papazipfel
https://www.247fairplay.com/CheatDetector/RenownedRenegade
https://www.247fairplay.com/CheatDetector/himic754
https://www.247fairplay.com/CheatDetector/Tem****ed

There are many more in my emails but I am not going to list everyone as I haven't got all day.

I accept that there are cheaters in video games but if this game is Steam only then VAC would be a good start
Click to expand...

I'll say again, there isn't one perfect anti cheat system. They all have pros and cons, even VAC.

It's the admins responsibilities to maintain and check the server for cheaters if they wish to keep their servers populated. Also, most anti cheat companies do not ban individual players from reports - this is done via auto detection or global bans via the admins on servers.

Maybe the players you are reporting aren't cheating and you're just a bad player?

You seem the type who would get killed a few times by the same guy and call cheats.
 
Nevakonaza said:
Game looks fantastic but 250k to take on a community manager?..i feel their fund raising goals are a bit OTT.

250K on "advanced particle effects"..come on.
Click to expand...

You do realise that it's only the difference between the goals that matters right? As in, the previous goal is 225k, that's then used up. The next goal is 250k, that gives them 25k to hire a community manager. You'd be lucky to hire someone for a year into that position at that rate.
 
Community manager is 25k for just doing forum stuff and a website update now and then. Damn that's a lot for basically what a PC guy can do in his spare time.
 
Ive backed this evening. Highly doubt we're going g to get to the single player campaign. I'd like the behind enemy lines mode though; sounds basically like horde.

Gone in for £25 and I am looking forward to this. Feels like it needs much more attention that's it's getting, especially if we want to be hitting the further stretch goals
 
Well, they said they really didn't want a single player campaign - so it makes sense they put a stupid amount for a stretch goal to make it unachievable.

Getting to the British forces stretch goal is enough for me thanks. I've backed at £50.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom