Battlefield 3 thread - Server details in opening post -

Davepen · 2 Apr 2012 at 14:02

timebomb26 said:
I use the PSO-1 at the moment. May change to the kobra actually as it would be handier at close range.

Ewwww.
No way man, that scope sucks, too much on screen!

I recommend the Kobra or the red dot sight for close/med range, if you want some magnification I'd go for the russian 3.4x scope.

LtMatt · 2 Apr 2012 at 14:04

Westie said:
Just played against this guy! defo hacker!

http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/soldier/aburajeh/stats/437894033/

Gerard · 2 Apr 2012 at 14:12

Apparently this is part of the map editor that Dice thinks would be far too complex for people to grasp. :rolleyes:

Also a slideshow showing other bits and bobs.

http://www.slideshare.net/DICEStudi...lable-system?ref=http://publications.dice.se/

scamartist · 2 Apr 2012 at 14:16

Conscript said:
The game isnt rewarding you for missing your target; it's providing an incentive for those who care about score to use the machine guns as intended. It's not "spray and pray" because if you're performing covering fire properly, you probably aren't aiming to kill anyone anyway.

If your not aiming to kill people what are you aiming at????

I aim at heads and then hit heads although not as often as I would like.

Well at least I'll get 50 points for missing.

muriel · 2 Apr 2012 at 14:31

Grand Bazaar Destrucded Map

Please this is not a frag video with superb effect editing video ...so if you dont like it dont insult please , there is a dislike button on YouTube for that ...or if you have some feedback i will be glad to hear it so i will do a better one next time since im not a pro video editing...just stop being haters Thank s

Ps: Caspian Border TOTAL map destruction coming soon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIBEz-kujzY&list=UUuUYCtduvSvjpWizRRUYDMA&index=1&feature=plcp

ck88 · 2 Apr 2012 at 14:37

muriel said:
Please this is not a frag video with superb effect editing video ...so if you dont like it dont insult please , there is a dislike button on YouTube for that ...or if you have some feedback i will be glad to hear it so i will do a better one next time since im not a pro video editing...just stop being haters Thank s

Ps: Caspian Border TOTAL map destruction coming soon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIBEz-kujzY&list=UUuUYCtduvSvjpWizRRUYDMA&index=1&feature=plcp

Dude, you posted it 2 hours ago, relax.

Davepen · 2 Apr 2012 at 14:39

scamartist said:
If your not aiming to kill people what are you aiming at????

I aim at heads and then hit heads although not as often as I would like.

Well at least I'll get 50 points for missing.

Never heard of suppressing fire?

Pin an enemy behind cover with heavy suppressing fire while your squadmates flank them.

maxilive · 2 Apr 2012 at 14:40

Gerard said:
Apparently this is part of the map editor that Dice thinks would be far too complex for people to grasp.

Also a slideshow showing other bits and bobs.

http://www.slideshare.net/DICEStudi...lable-system?ref=http://publications.dice.se/

None of it would be too hard if not they wouldn't try and sell the Frostbite engine and tools

What is hard is providing a modding ground support for the game to handle different map, models, game types etc without a lot of work from their part. All of which doesn't give them "that" much benefit with their plans for subscription models and DLC.

ck88 · 2 Apr 2012 at 14:42

Davepen said:
Never heard of suppressing fire?

Pin an enemy behind cover with heavy suppressing fire while your squadmates flank them.

That's fine, but you don't even need to aim at anyone any more to suppress them.

Edit: Actually watch this video and then tell me that's the way it should be and all is fine and dandy.

scamartist · 2 Apr 2012 at 14:45

My point exactly

timebomb26 · 2 Apr 2012 at 14:58

Man, that video is seriously great.

nicks3607 · 2 Apr 2012 at 15:03

Davepen said:
Never heard of suppressing fire?

Pin an enemy behind cover with heavy suppressing fire while your squadmates flank them.

I quite like the disorientation aspect of having my vision blur when I've got rounds coming at me. What I don't like, though, is the thought that my bullets start going everywhere

Also - does it not seem to work on snipers?

I've sprayed a good few rounds at snipers, and still get head-shotted!!

Gerard · 2 Apr 2012 at 15:08

ck88 said:
That's fine, but you don't even need to aim at anyone any more to suppress them.

Edit: Actually watch this video and then tell me that's the way it should be and all is fine and dandy.

Few pages late

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=21592984&postcount=56041

ck88 · 2 Apr 2012 at 15:10

I know, I remembered you're post, that's where I stole it from

:(Rhodri:) · 2 Apr 2012 at 15:13

nicks3607 said:
I quite like the disorientation aspect of having my vision blur when I've got rounds coming at me. What I don't like, though, is the thought that my bullets start going everywhere

Also - does it not seem to work on snipers? I've sprayed a good few rounds at snipers, and still get head-shotted!!

I personally like the idea of suppression, but the way they've done the massively inaccurate return fire is stupid. I'd prefer it if they still blurred your screen and increased recoil whilst suppressed - It'd be harder for you to shoot back but would still be possible if you aim carefully at least.

Gerard · 2 Apr 2012 at 15:17

ck88 said:
I know, I remembered you're post, that's where I stole it from

kunoichia · 2 Apr 2012 at 15:41

ck88 said:
That's fine, but you don't even need to aim at anyone any more to suppress them.

Edit: Actually watch this video and then tell me that's the way it should be and all is fine and dandy.

Haha nearly **** myself. Awesome video.

Edit: O noes bad word!

Conscript · 2 Apr 2012 at 15:59

scamartist said:
If your not aiming to kill people what are you aiming at????

I aim at heads and then hit heads although not as often as I would like.

Well at least I'll get 50 points for missing.

Conscript said:
There's more to this game than just killing your enemies, and sometimes being able to ensure they don't shoot back is just as valuable and valid a tactic.

You don't get 50 points for missing. You get 50 points for laying down fire which disorientated the enemy and helped your advancing team mates to kill them. You seem to have it in your head that you always need to make a kill, and that any time you don't, you've failed.

Either way, the desired effect is achieved; the enemy doesn't fire back (unless they are stupid enough to not realise that the whip cracks and dust flying around them are being generated by a hail of lead from an emplaced machine gun, and so decide to stick their heads out).

I agree that post patch the effect has been vastly exagerrated. But this doesn't mean that the basis of the mechanic isnt a good idea that was originally well implemented. And it certianly doesnt deserve comments like "its just a reward for missing your target" or "its a crutch for poor players" because you've misunderstood why it's there.

PapaLazaru · 2 Apr 2012 at 16:00

The people stating that the hit-reg in BC2 is better than BF3 are wrong imo. It is far better in BF3 and everyone I regularly game with (who are BF2 / BC2 vets) all agree. It must be your connections as I have not experienced dodgy hit detection once.

Westie · 2 Apr 2012 at 16:06

PapaLazaru said:
The people stating that the hit-reg in BC2 is better than BF3 are wrong imo. It is far better in BF3 and everyone I regularly game with (who are BF2 / BC2 vets) all agree. It must be your connections as I have not experienced dodgy hit detection once.

Same as me papa! Reg is awesome for me! I just think people enjoy moaning!