BF3 vs MW3

MW3 is a pile of crap.

Same old engine done to death and same old gameplay done to death since CSS. I am shocked this game has not died as if u just reskin it to use quake weapons and maps, thats exactly what this game is.

a quake/unreal tournament game under the skins. Gaming has evolved far greater then standard death match corridor shooting. At least BF3 offers something diffeent. large scale MP. multiple ways to gain points intead of just amount of kills, multiple ways to fight the enemy using tanks, jets etc and to top it all off, a engine that looks sensational.
 
MW3 has been designed for a generation that like to grab a controller and think they pwn at shooting people. It's such an amusing thing to see people getting conned over and over again into buying new games and map packs.. Value for money doesn't spring to mind ;)
 
Haven't played MW3 yet either. Might get it but only for singleplayer campaign. I know from the previous iterations that I just won't find the enclosed faster paced multiplayer as enjoyable as Battlefield's open games. Personal preference only though.

Really starting to enjoy BF3 now that I've jumped onto hardcore servers. Had the same thing in BC2!

For folks talking about better netcode etc unfortunately BF3 is orders of magnitude more complicated. Destructable terrain, far bigger maps, very impressive sound and physics engine blah blah blah. Im amazed it works at all tbh!

If dice can fix the issues (and there's a fair few) then bf3 will be a stonking game.
 
I'm not actually mad keen on either, and I bought both. I love the graphics and environment design on BF3, but the size of the maps can be very frustrating when you trek 10 miles only to get shot by some idiot in the bushes.

COD meanwhile has a good formula, but it's been so done to death I struggle to feel more than a hint of enthusiasm for it.
 
Battlefield 3 all the way.

Battlefield 3 is something new, something different, and is so great and precise shooting that it has amazing infantry battles aswell as battles with vehicles on large maps.

Cod on the other hand is the same as theyv always done, different guns, and different maps and calling it a different name, same engine, old tech.

The nick name i give COD is Chavs on dope, they just sit around a xbox smoking and playing cod. nothing great about that life at all.

Battlefield 3 is for us real gamers on the computer :)
 
reflux said:
I'm not actually mad keen on either, and I bought both. I love the graphics and environment design on BF3, but the size of the maps can be very frustrating when you trek 10 miles only to get shot by some idiot in the bushes.

COD meanwhile has a good formula, but it's been so done to death I struggle to feel more than a hint of enthusiasm for it.
Click to expand...

I thought spawn on squad was put into the game to prevent your first example? :p
 
LeJosh said:
I thought spawn on squad was put into the game to prevent your first example? :p
Click to expand...

Yeah but there's always an idiot in the bushes somewhere. I swear some people spend more time admiring the foliage than actually playing the game :D
 
How about the single player campaigns in each as a factor in the comparison?

I've always enjoyed the campaigns in these but never got into multiplayer much due to hackers and pre pubescent teens abusing everyone. Nearly finished BF3 and enjoying it, how's MW3 compare?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom