Soldato
Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
rafster said:Most people's basis is for synthetic benchmarks. Maybe it's because I don't have much time to game (have other things which are more important, like my partner, teaching and postgraduate degree), but I do not see any point whatsoever in getting a card so early. Like the others mentioned, you can get more than acceptable performance for far less than £500, and secondly the refreshes will be better to buy for DX10 etc.
LoadsaMoney said:Of course DX10 is all everyone is interested in, you hear ppl banging on saying 'ive had my 6/8/7800/x1800 etc... for a while now, so ill be getting one of these, not for DX10 etc...', yes sure its not for DX10, if you wanted a few more frames in DX9 you would have got rid of your 7800 for a 7900, or your x800 card for an x1800 etc..., the next model up, as they boost DX9 as well just like the G80 so whats the diff, oh yeah its DX10, thats the diff isnt it, so no ones buying em for DX10 then eh.
Some people have the time to game and want the fastest card.You say you can get more than acceptable performance for far less than £500? Some people do not want acceptable perfromance they want cutting edge performance.
Some people want the fastest car,Cars are not my thing.I don't understand anyone paying 100 grand on a car when I can get the same performance for 20 grand.
rafster said:I am kind of glad I am not into gaming as I used to be, pointless wasting of money and a lot of eWilly. Maybe the 8800GTX will make FM2007 load 2 frames faster or something.
Time to go back to using my PC time for meaningful things; research.
easyrider said:Your posts are very thinly based considering you are doing a degree.
Gaming may not be your thing.
I for one do not care.Just like you should not care if people want to spend their money on the latest tech.
rafster said:I am kind of glad I am not into gaming as I used to be, pointless wasting of money and a lot of eWilly. Maybe the 8800GTX will make FM2007 load 2 frames faster or something.
But a prestige car offers good resale value, and in terms of its basic use, is more meaningful than buying a GFX card (status? pleasure to drive?). Being at the cutting edge is kinda pointless if the cutting edge offers no real incentive over current tech in current times. All I can see is to boast that you have it...
Time to go back to using my PC time for meaningful things; research.
Cars are not a good analogy. People buy expensive cars for many more reasons than just performance. You could have a car that is as fast as most Ferraris, but does that make them equivalent to Ferraris in appeal, prestige, etc? No.easyrider said:Some people have the time to game and want the fastest card.You say you can get more than acceptable performance for far less than £500? Some people do not want acceptable perfromance they want cutting edge performance.
Some people want the fastest car,Cars are not my thing.I don't understand anyone paying 100 grand on a car when I can get the same performance for 20 grand.
easyrider said:What has meaning got to do with anything?
How people decode meaning is up to them.
You say:"All I can see is to boast that you have it..."
And in the same sentance you say getting an expensive car offers Status!
So people dont get a flash car to willy wave?
Your priceless.
rafster said:You need to realise that everyone doesn't agree with you on here, and when someone offers a differing opinion to stop rubbishing them, and changing your stance constantly. You say you do not care, yet you will spend the best part of a day trying to convince everyone why you're right and everyone else is wrong.
/back to lurking.
rafster said:A GFX card won't offer you REAL LIFE priveledges that a nice car will. Try owning one and see.
I thank you for that pleasure, seeing as most the "drama" on this board is based around you, and makes it a great read when I am bored.
And I thought it was based around me today.rafster said:I thank you for that pleasure, seeing as most the "drama" on this board is based around you, and makes it a great read when I am bored.
fornowagain said:
Yes they did, and they made the same fuss when the X1950XT-X came out (including myself.)ugly ferret said:Did people make as much of a fuss when the x1900xtx came out for a similar price when it it launched? My memory is a bit hazy but I seem to remember nothing but praise for ati's new card.
If you were going to buy Crossfire anyway right now then I suppose the 8800GTX is in principal the better option for the reasons you've mentioned.jimmyjimmyo said:I'm just building a new rig and I am waiting for a 24" BenQ to come into stock before OCUK ship my order I was going to go X1900xt crossfire (it's as fast if not a little faster) but tbh I think I like the look of this new nvidia card and it offers me an upgrade path to SLI at a later date (once the 2nd card drops in price in 12 months or so) obviously I am trying to build a PC to last a while so I guess this is the best bet?.
I have been using ATI for a while so what can I expect from this change in terms of image quality. Is are there any negative impact on visual quality using Nvidia (last card I had from them was a geforce 2)?
you dont need to crossfire 2 x1950 xt`s or x1900 xtxDurzel said:If you were going to buy Crossfire anyway right now then I suppose the 8800GTX is in principal the better option for the reasons you've mentioned.
I guess it would depend really on whether or not X1950/X1900 cards will be affected significantly once 8800GTX is actually launched, because at the moment the cost is roughly the same.
Bear in mind though that you could Quad SLI two 7950GX2s in the same fashion and probably achieve the same results (assuming Nvidia sort the drivers out)