Associate
the launch timelines are disappointing, i am hoping that the leather jacket man surprises us with a surprise announcement next week
Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
lol heres one doing the rounds.. its going to be a 2-slot air-cooled card with 600w rated peak power consumptionI'm down for speculation and debate but some of you need to calm down as your acting like power consumption, specs and pricing leaks are confirmed as legit.
Nah, they just use AI for everything these daysIm sure Nvidia have their minions checking a lot of forums.. 'word on the street init'
Borderline?Yeah thinking that it's going to be 10% up from a 4090 is just borderline cope:
If you push too hard towards PT (and 25% is nothing here as it barely would increase number of rays, it would need to be orders of magnitude higher to really replace raster) you will run into raster bottleneck or CPU one (as CPU still very important to current RT/PT implementations). Architecture has to be balanced and currently it feels like it is in 4k series. I expect them to just present some new AI based magic that won't work on 4k series for some reason and will be the main selling point (and it will take 2+ years to even see it in any game).It will depend how much the architecture will steer towards RT/PT, favoring those more. SER I believe, can be up to 25% performance improvement.
It's just more transistors for more power use in 5090, unlikely to see any other big improvements.Wouldn't factor in the D just yet, even the 4090D is specced higher than the 5080:
The mem bandwidth and bus width speak for themselves really It's not like the core architecture is very different to gain performance via efficiency either here.
So history repeats itself?5080 looks like it's actually a 5070
The objective way to measure it is: what benefit do I as a buyer get from this purchase? If it brings the buyer joy and allows them to indulge the hobbies they love, then it's worth it to the buyer.I'm sure someone can come up with a way to objectively value a 4090, though realistically it's hard to say what it's "really worth".
The objective way to measure it is: what benefit do I as a buyer get from this purchase? If it brings the buyer joy and allows them to indulge the hobbies they love, then it's worth it to the buyer.
I've been there with 4090 But absolutely not interested in getting 5090, still feel 0 need for it. Maybe 6000 series will bring something that will woo me over.Sounds like someone prepping themselves to buy the 5090 I would say.
Pebcak
I've been there with 4090 But absolutely not interested in getting 5090, still feel 0 need for it. Maybe 6000 series will bring something that will woo me over.
let’s see how well people lap this 5090 up and I bet we’ll be getting a £4000 6090 and people will still lap it up, yeah I can’t blame them if I was big enough and could mug people like that maybe I would, or maybe I wouldn’t, maybe I’d just see pc games as a chore and just huff and puff and sell a really high priced gpu because all I’m interested in is the AI scene, then milk the tier down from it for as much as I could for minimal gain while also milking it with revenue from people streaming games that utilise my overpriced GPUs to further increase my profit margins
I'm the same - I feel like I can skip.a gen with my 4090 unless somehow the 5090 ends up being a really great deal (I doubt it though).I've been there with 4090 But absolutely not interested in getting 5090, still feel 0 need for it. Maybe 6000 series will bring something that will woo me over.
Because it IS about feels or else 6600xt 8gb would be on top of every chart, gamers would only have a 1080p screen and AMD would laugh all the way to the bank. It's not a business, there's no objective ROI outside a subjective view.I don’t know about anyone else, but that sounds subjective rather than objective i.e. feels over facts.