When a sale is subject to this warning the purchaser assumes the risk that the product might be either defective or unsuitable to his or her needs. This rule is not designed to shield sellers who engage in Fraud or bad faith dealing by making false or misleading representations about the quality or condition of a particular product. It merely summarizes the concept that a purchaser must examine, judge, and test a product considered for purchase himself or herself.
Would you like to explain why the image you used in your listing is in fact from a a YouTube video and not the phone you were selling at all?
For your convenience, here's a screenshot of the thumbnail of a YouTube video, which shows the same photo as used in your listing. http://imgur.com/ikNrQXN.
Why did you not post your own photos of the phone? Is it possibly because you knew that if you did, they would show the phone to not be in "excellent" condition, as you stated in the listing?
I would NEVER buy a phone from ebay. I used to work for Vodafone and we got calls about it all the time. People would sell their phones through ebay, then as soon as they had the money they would call up their provider and report the phone stolen, so they could claim a replacement through their insurance. The phone would be blacklisted as a result, and the poor sap who bought it would suddenly find themselves with a useless phone. And since the person who bought it never had the original sales receipt, there was no way for them to prove it wasn't a stolen phone. Which means the network couldn't unblacklist it for them. We had to tell customers to try their luck getting the seller to give the money back.
I would NEVER buy a phone from ebay. I used to work for Vodafone and we got calls about it all the time. People would sell their phones through ebay, then as soon as they had the money they would call up their provider and report the phone stolen, so they could claim a replacement through their insurance. The phone would be blacklisted as a result, and the poor sap who bought it would suddenly find themselves with a useless phone. And since the person who bought it never had the original sales receipt, there was no way for them to prove it wasn't a stolen phone. Which means the network couldn't unblacklist it for them. We had to tell customers to try their luck getting the seller to give the money back.
Surely if they've claimed on a Vodafone insurance policy, you could do somethig about it? That would be illegal fraud perpetrated against Vodafone.
Surely if they've claimed on a Vodafone insurance policy, you could do somethig about it? That would be illegal fraud perpetrated against Vodafone.
Last time I bought a phone in "immaculate" condition and "used for one week" from ebay it was in horrific condition had been used for months and had videos and pictures of the previous owner having sex.
Last time I bought a phone in "immaculate" condition and "used for one week" from ebay it was in horrific condition had been used for months and had videos and pictures of the previous owner having sex.
I used a stock image from another eBay sale. Stop being a grade A a..wipe and just accept that I'll accept return, you have been a total waste of time and money for me, all that's bad about eBay.....