Mal, everything you've said so far in this thread has been a load of uninformed ********.
time splitters 2 is one off the best fps ever even though it was on ps 2
Agree with both of you.
Mal, everything you've said so far in this thread has been a load of uninformed ********.
time splitters 2 is one off the best fps ever even though it was on ps 2
crap, this is not a good FPS fact
i doubt you even know what makes a good shooter do you, because if you think this is a good shooter then you have no idea at all.
this is a run and gun online team shooter, there are no tactics used/ cover system/ stealth etc, it is not a class act, it does not even look like much fun either; it looks totally bloody boring
you buy it, but i'd much rather play FEAR/ VEGAS 2 terrorist hunt.
whose talking crap ? because i think you are
Me! played a Medic in TF2 mostly also and loved it.Who seriously wants to go online and be the medic?
yes indeed, they do if you're fighting in real life, because cover/ stealth/ tactics is what keeps you alive
You play Fear and Vegas Single Player only, your last MP shooter was Fear Combat which was practically a fee mini-game, and you profess to be an FPS god. You're an idiot.
Thanks for the link, 1st impressions:
Sniper scope doesn't stay zoomed in to see the kill but maybe that's just how the player liked to do it
No real single player campaign, just a sequence of bot assisted team events/mods - booo! seriously boooo!
I think it's just too complicated to work online unless you become a fanboi of the game. Don't most people want to just fire up a shooter and get fragging right away?
Oh the irony. I suggest you read back over the rest of your posts in this thread if you want to see what a childish comment looks like.
Given that you act like you're gods gift to FPS gaming (because no one else knows what makes a good FPS game while you do), I think its a fairly safe bet that you're overcompensating and are actually a terrible player who thinks he's good.
but i still know what makes a good FPS, simply because i used to be a soldier and gaming like this will get you killed instantly in real life.
i'm basically an old man now, but i still know what makes a good FPS, simply because i used to be a soldier and gaming like this will get you killed instantly in real life.
i might actually be a 60 year old gamer who fought in the Falklands, i cant play multiplayer because my reactions aren't as fast as they once were, i'm basically an old man now, but i still know what makes a good FPS, simply because i used to be a soldier and gaming like this will get you killed instantly in real life.
i game like you younger guys do, well why not, plus a few of my friends do too, but we cant do MP because it's too fast for us, good grief i'm not half as quick as i was when i was 20.
i'm crap at typing etc, yes but i'm only online about 3 hours per week.
ahahaha not that i believe you, but this is either epic trolling or just incredible stupidity.
I dont know, but imho i would think that a realistic game would be boring, 1 headshot kills and no respawn, if its a long game your going to be playing for a couple of minutes then in spectator mode till the game finishes.
I dont know, but imho i would think that a realistic game would be boring, 1 headshot kills and no respawn, if its a long game your going to be playing for a couple of minutes then in spectator mode till the game finishes.
I dont know, but imho i would think that a realistic game would be boring, 1 headshot kills and no respawn, if its a long game your going to be playing for a couple of minutes then in spectator mode till the game finishes.
The game is set as a fictitious futuristic shoot 'em up. Can we stop comparing it to real life and "realistic" FPS's?
Lol at above ^