I'm not sure you know what a fact is.Without their ground game MMA fighters could never beat Bruce Lee, it's a fact.
I'm not sure you know what a fact is.Without their ground game MMA fighters could never beat Bruce Lee, it's a fact.
Murray with ease. Bruce's obsolete Wing Chun would have no affect against Murray's racket swing.
If Murry can have a racket then Bruce Lee can have nunchucks. Lol
I'm not sure you know what a fact is.
My previous statement was 100% fact.
A trained MMA fighter will 9.8/10 beat a street fighter
So he would only stand a chance if we were to tailor the competition exactly to his strengths and to remove everyone elses? Sounds hmmm fair.
Look what happened to Kimbo - although he did better than I thought he would in fairness.
So he would only stand a chance if we were to tailor the competition exactly to his strengths and to remove everyone elses? Sounds hmmm fair.
I'm just saying, ban the floor hugging and they could never beat Bruce.
Bruce Lee also used Wing Chun, a form of Kung Fu I'm currently learning.
And a lot of it requires you to be in close, I don't know how well some of these martial artists would hold up against ground and pound.
Yeah I know i'm jumping to the end and posting, but i'm off to work in 5 mins. No time to read the whole thread.
Ground fighting comes down to strength ultimately, if you can't manipulate your opponent's body in a way that puts them at a disadvantage due to a lack of strength compared to theirs, you won't win.
I fully expect very few martial artists would hold up well at all to ground and pound against someone with a weight advantage (for those claiming Bruce Lee would cain people in weight classes above his).
BJJ isn't really down to strength. Strength helps with any aspect of MA but BJJ was specifically designed for the small guy to be able to beat the big guy. Of course if the big guy is as skilled as the small guy the small guy is going to have a bad time but technique almost always beats strength.
BJJ isn't really down to strength.