If you think DRS is great and adds to the sport then that's fine, I don't and I won't be changing my mind, as neither will you so it's pointless running in circles again.
I'm not trying to say DRS is fantastically wonderfull. Its far from it. Its artificial, its changing the way people think about overtaking, and its making overtakes that could be epic into quite simple ones.
...
It is the lesser of 2 evils. It is by no means the ideal solution.
And after this from you...
Jesus you do like to take a comment, spin it around, mix it up a bit then come out with some rubbish don't you.
Its the same old OcUK F1 thread problem, a balanced middle ground view is just not acceptable. Because I don't think DRS is 100% utter ****, that must mean I think its 100% utterly brilliant and perfect...
Just like suggesting that Hamilton wasn't completely useless and 100% to blame for every incident last year got me labeled a Hamilton fanboy.
And not filling the forum with rants claiming that the Sky deal was the work of the devil got me labeled a Sky fanboy.
For what its worth, I think DRS sucks. But I see it as being better than the alternative of processional races with neutered racing. Given the choice between something ****, and something slightly less ****, I'll take the slightly less **** option.
Last edited: