Caster Semenya could be forced to undertake hormone therapy for future Olympics

If you have the testosterone levels of a male, then you can't fairly compete against females, because for all intents and purposes you have the same advantage as someone who is using steroids. It's pointless for the women to run against her. It would be like competing in bodybuilding against Ronnie Coleman or Arnold Schwarzenegger as a natural athlete, entirely pointless.
 
I'm just trying to say that both are entirely natural conditions. If I tried to wear fins to compete in a swimming comp I would be thrown out. Thorpe had a huge natural advantage, as does Semenya.

I know what you were trying to say, you've just repeated it... I can repeat again that we don't segregate based on those sorts of physical features, we segregated based on sex.
 
And Semenya is female. She just has a condition that gives her some male characteristics. Just like some women have blonde hair/brown eyes.

she's intersex, she's more male really but she choses to identify as female, that is the issue.. if you're going to segregate based on sex, then it is a bit farcical to let someone with the physical benefits of a man compete as a woman
 
And Semenya is female. She just has a condition that gives her some male characteristics. Just like some women have blonde hair/brown eyes.

If you're incapable or unwilling to separate "some women have blonde hair" from "Semenya has testicles", then you're not willing to engage in the premise that men and women are different. At which point there can be no meaningful dialogue between you and us because you refuse to use common, historical and meaningful definitions which the rest of us recognize.
 
Caitlyn Jenner?

Not intersex at all. An autogynephile who got sexual arousal from dressing up as a woman and used to sneak into his ten year old daughter's bedroom and play with her underwear. (The daughter ended up setting up a web cam to try and find out what was happening and saw her father doing it - Jenner told the story himself as a "funny" anecdote. Can't imagine how she felt seeing her naked father doing things with her underwear).
 
If you're incapable or unwilling to separate "some women have blonde hair" from "Semenya has testicles", then you're not willing to engage in the premise that men and women are different. At which point there can be no meaningful dialogue between you and us because you refuse to use common, historical and meaningful definitions which the rest of us recognize.

I think you are missing my point - I'm simply saying that a person who has lived her life as a woman, is regarded by the IAAF as a woman and has legal status as a woman is also gentically 'blessed' with a condition that makes her faster than other 'women'. The 'alledged' un-descended testicles is irrelevant until either they or the testosterone they produce stop her running in womans athletics.

Do I think she is 100% woman? No. 100% man? No.

But I am happy to use she/her as that is how she wants to be seen. Her eligibility to compete in women's athletics is up to the IAAF and probably the courts to determine, not us !
 
Her eligibility to compete in women's athletics is up to the IAAF and probably the courts to determine, not us !

kind of irrelevant, I think everyone posting is well aware that their opinion/post on the matter isn't going to affect her eligibility
 
The one and only reason men and women compete separately is because men have organs that produce a natural PED. So does Caster. This is incredibly unfair to the other women.
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/48102479

Caster Semenya has lost a landmark case against athletics' governing body meaning it will be allowed to restrict testosterone levels in female runners.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) rejected the South African's challenge against the IAAF's new rules.

But Cas said it had "serious concerns as to the future practical application" of the regulations.

Olympic 800m champion Semenya, 28, said in response to the ruling that the IAAF "have always targeted me specifically".

Now she - and other athletes with differences of sexual development (DSD) - must either take medication in order to compete in track events from 400m to the mile, or change to another distance.

"For a decade the IAAF has tried to slow me down, but this has actually made me stronger. The decision of Cas will not hold me back," said Semenya in a statement.

"I will once again rise above and continue to inspire young women and athletes in South Africa and around the world."

Previously, she had said that she wanted to "run naturally, the way I was born".

Cas found that the rules for athletes with DSD were discriminatory - but that the discrimination was "necessary, reasonable and proportionate" to protect "the integrity of female athletics".


This bit seems a bit optimistic: "For a decade the IAAF has tried to slow me down, but this has actually made me stronger. The decision of Cas will not hold me back," I suspect that her times will drop off significantly once the testosterone is reduced.


This is still a minefield though, this is a bit of a fudge to balance her desire to compete as a woman and the fact she's apparently got male advantages. Testosterone reduction doesn't avoid other issues such as say bone structure/height etc.. in boxing, wrestling or basketball.
 
Frankly, they're making a mistake by trying to allow someone to compete based on hormone treatments. For a start, the IAAF should not be condoning or encouraging harmful non-essential treatments for sporting purposes. After all, that is one of the rationals for banning other substances - yes, those substances offer a performance advantage in their cases but the justification has always been that it sends out a wrong message and offers an unfair advantage. Caster will be physically worse off on testosterone suppressants (quality of life, libido, psychologically). And as for advantage, whilst it seems counter-intuitive to think of testosterone suppression as conveying an unfair advantage the practical outcome here is to allow a male to compete in women's events, which is still an advantage. Caster is a male athlete with a developmental disorder. They have testicles, they're just internal. They never had a properly developed penis but you don't run with your penis (I would imagine). Males have different body proportions, different levels of muscular development, different chest size (cardio-vascular advantage). Even separate from all these things, is it acceptable for someone to spend 28 years with the developmental advantages of having higher testosterone and then take some drugs to lower it before an event and claim that makes you equal? If a woman spent years juicing and then stopped for a couple of weeks whilst she competed, would that be acceptable? Yes, testosterone suppressants will impact Caster's performance. But it wont suddenly make him a woman.

There are a number of intersex disorders but generally speaking, intersex people have a sex, they just have a failure to express it correctly. E.g. as in this case where Caster is a male (with the accompanying biological advantages) but their genitalia did not express correctly.

It's an unfortunate situation and I feel sorry for Caster. But I'm not willing to throw out Women's Sports for their sake. They can legitimately compete in the men's events if they wish. Nobody is going to say to a man "you can't try out with us because we can't see your balls". But the truth is that Caster wouldn't even place in the men's events. They'd never have made it to the finals. The only reason she/he has is because he's a biological male who chose (I repeat, chose), to compete against women.
 
And Semenya is female. She just has a condition that gives her some male characteristics. Just like some women have blonde hair/brown eyes.

I disagree with this from both a scientific and sporting. Seemenya has testes and I'm pretty sure an XY Chromosone. From a sporting perspective she/he not only has far far higher testosterone, but certainly appears to have male hips and bone structure, which are advantageous amongst many other male attributes. Technically he is a man who's sexual organs never developed properly.

From a sporting perspective it's an absolute travesty watching a man with all the natural advantages compete with women. If he does indeed have all male advantages and no female drawbacks, he actually isn't a particularly good athlete.
 
We seem to have drifted from the original point, so here's a reminder:

She's a bloke, with plums, who got clever and thought she'd identify as a woman to compete with women and have the upper hand of male genetics. The world went nuts but she was committed to the lie and here we are today.

She's a bloke, end of.
 
Come on...thats a dude.

It's ridiculous that we are all expected to play this game and go along with it.
 
Last edited:
Caster Semenya has had the advantage of growing up with higher testosterone levels as well which affects bone density, muscle density etc. which gives her an advantage even if they lower her testosterone levels now.

They need to come up with categories for these people similar to what they do in the paralympics because there are all sorts of levels to this.
 
I feel sorry for all the female athletes who train for their lives to compete at these types of events, and knowing they don't stand a chance of even competing when they're up against a man who wants to identify as a woman.

It just makes the whole thing a farce!

He/she is free to identify as whatever gender they wish to identify as, but when it comes to competing in sports, he/she needs to compete against equals.

As somone else said earlier on, he's probably a rubbish athlete who would never even be able to compete in men's events, so now by identifying as a woman, he can now win golds.
 
Back
Top Bottom