• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

CES 2025 AMD & Nvidia Keynote Live Chat [06/01/25]

That was you earlier when seeing the performance numbers and price being revealed. And here you are now:

juqwSRX.png
Still lolling at this
 
  • Love
Reactions: TNA
its basically check mate for amd and Intel.. they are not going to survive this
too late to make that shift to AI and when they do make that shift they decided to go midrange exclusive, which now in AI terms looks like entry level worse than APU level

Corrected for you, even Intel's new GPUs now seem overpriced at their performance level and issues with older systems.
 
Last edited:
nope no not at all.. both parties are positioning their products around AI tech, and nvidia here is the clearly superior option by 15 lightyears
amd doesnt have any product that showcases raw horsepower, neither does it have any that showcases ai performance, its nowhere, theres no niche for it to fall back on
and nvidia's achieved this effortlessly with a small uplift in transistor count, next gen is going to a bloodbath because then we are again talking about a big increase in transistor count
amd's done in discrete graphics, it was good to know you
It seems some are taking great delight in amd not being competitive for some strange reason. (possibly Intel fanboy hurt over amd killing them in cpu?)

I'm not a fanboy for any company I don't have stock in, I've mostly had nvidia and I'm likely to get nvidia this time around but I also own a 6950xt (got it cheap) and is a good card as well. We need amd and Intel to bring out good cards, we need Intel to bring out competitive cpus as well.

Competition controls pricing, encourages technological advancement and it gives us choice.

If any one company completely controls the market we the consumer will suffer.

Ffs people are already conditioned to 2k is a good price or 1k is a good price for the 2nd tier card. These prices are wild expensive but its all we have on offer at the moment.

I just don't understand people's glee that there's no viable competition in this space and our wallets are going to be hit extremely hard because of it
 
Last edited:
That is the issue with them waiting until Nvidia releases. Nvidia waited for GDDR7 to be in production - AMD just waited for "reasons" despite using GDDR6. It could be AMD have their own stuff too,but nobody knows because they couldn't be bothered talking about their own cards.

Now,the cards will be compared with the RTX5000 series cards when they launch and not the older ones. They will be worth less than if launched a few months ago.

Everything going according to plan.

everything-is-fine-all-ok.gif

Exactly they should have done an Intel and released early at an attractive price for that time and they would have made less of a loss for a while.
 
It seems some are taking great delight in amd not being competitive for some strange reason. (possibly Intel fanboy hurt over amd killing them in cpu?)

I'm not a fanboy for any company I don't have stock in, I've mostly had nvidia and I'm likely to get nvidia this time around but I also own a 6950xt (got it cheap) and is a good card as well. We need amd and Intel to bring out good cards, we need Intel to bring out competitive cpus as well.

Competition controls pricing, encourages technological advancement and it gives us choice.

If any one company completely controls the market we the consumer will suffer.

Ffs people are already conditioned to 2k is a good price or 1k is a good price for the 2nd tier card. These prices are wild expensive but its all we have on offer at the moment.

I just don't understand people's glee that there's no viable competition in this space and our wallets are going to be hit extremely hard because of it
it was just an analysis of the situation
 
You guys can't say Jensen didn't warn us

Last year he said Moore's law is dead and future GPUs would get most of their performance from fake AI, and that's exactly what's Nvidia has delivered - RTX5000 gets most of it's performance from AI frames
 
Last edited:
It seems some are taking great delight in amd not being competitive for some strange reason. (possibly Intel fanboy hurt over amd killing them in cpu?)

I'm not a fanboy for any company I don't have stock in, I've mostly had nvidia and I'm likely to get nvidia this time around but I also own a 6950xt (got it cheap) and is a good card as well. We need amd and Intel to bring out good cards, we need Intel to bring out competitive cpus as well.

Competition controls pricing, encourages technological advancement and it gives us choice.

If any one company completely controls the market we the consumer will suffer.

Ffs people are already conditioned to 2k is a good price or 1k is a good price for the 2nd tier card. These prices are wild expensive but its all we have on offer at the moment.

I just don't understand people's glee that there's no viable competition in this space and our wallets are going to be hit extremely hard because of it

You start taking delight when AMD keeps making the same mistakes over and over again. You just got to give up and laugh in the end. This is coming from someone who used to mainly buy Radeon GPU's and disliked Jensen and his 970 4gb fiasco.

Why book a CES slot before nvidia and present what they did. Does no one have any marketing experience over there?
 
Back
Top Bottom