Associate
- Joined
- 2 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 2,066
I swear, this presentation has been one movie reference after another; Terminator, Iron Man 2, now Avatar...
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
So going by Nvidia's site about DLSS 4, the cyberpunk video is slightly misleading as its using DLSS 3.5 on the 4000 series but DLSS 4 on the 5000 series, not sure why they didn't use DLSS 4 on the 4090 to compare... i know it will still be a big difference but interesting why they did that...
I quoted you but wasn't aimed at you specifically, there's been several posts by multiple people with a gloating vibe to it. Certainly nothing personal to youit was just an analysis of the situation
lol, yeah, it's been near 90 minutes now. Very little GPU info, but what they put out already sunk any competition out there, so I suppose they could do what they want really...
It does.Because the 4090 doesn't support DLSS4.
You guys can't say Jensen didn't warn us
Last year he said Moore's law is dead and future GPUs would get most of their performance from fake AI, and that's exactly what's Nvidia has delivered - RTX5000 gets most of it's performance from AI frames
It does.
Performance wasn't the thing that ended the competition - It's the pricing aspect as well.How's that? without fake frames the performance will be hardly up on ada. Nvidia be selling you software that a modder released months back for current gen cards. Reviews will show the real picture. Telling that Nvidia has not shown performance without frame gen.
Because AMD have had the benefit of the doubt so many times before and today they not only fumbled again, but wasted everyone's time who was interested in their products. Before the conference most were really positive they would be able to turn the ship around. Intel are our best hope for true competition now IMO.I quoted you but wasn't aimed at you specifically, there's been several posts by multiple people with a gloating vibe to it. Certainly nothing personal to you
I can't disagree with the shambles amd are when it comes to marketing and it's actually unfathomable how they are so bad at it for so long.You start taking delight when AMD keeps making the same mistakes over and over again. You just got to give up and laugh in the end. This is coming from someone who used to mainly buy Radeon GPU's and disliked Jensen and his 970 4gb fiasco.
Why book a CES slot before nvidia and present what they did. Does no one have any marketing experience over there?
You start taking delight when AMD keeps making the same mistakes over and over again. You just got to give up and laugh in the end. This is coming from someone who used to mainly buy Radeon GPU's and disliked Jensen and his 970 4gb fiasco.
Why book a CES slot before nvidia and present what they did. Does no one have any marketing experience over there?
It does.. it just doesn't have multi frame generation.Because the 4090 doesn't support DLSS4.
Performance wasn't the thing that ended the competition - It's the pricing aspect as well.
Because AMD have had the benefit of the doubt so many times before and today they not only fumbled again, but wasted everyone's time who was interested in their products. Before the conference most were really positive they would be able to turn the ship around. Intel are our best hope for true competition now IMO.
You know AMDs pricing? I'm not interested in fake frames.
DLSS 3.5 is what a 40 series supports.It does.
DLSS 3.5 is what a 40 series supports.
DLSS 4 is 50 series only.