Chemical attack in London...

200sols said:
What'll happen is some poor dude will get thrown under the bus and the system will continue to not function as intended. One point I agree with D.P is that the system is underfunded and one can only conclude that it is deliberate.
Click to expand...
It is deliberate because it causes headlines like x million spent on asylum seekers hotel bills. The Tories believe this will directly lead to voted because, well sending 100 people to rawanda while breaking many international laws will have such a profound impact.

The immigration and small problem is easily solved, but if they solve that the. they have nothing to scare voters.
 
I can hear the distant “clickety click” of mechanical keyboards compiling the dossier now. 2 cases (and counting?) in 20 years.

I was amazed he got from Croydon to Streatham so quickly (according to London Tonight) what with those roadworks on the A23.

He’s got to either be hiding somewhere like a landfill (Beddington?) or he”s offed himself. I can’t believe anyone is going to take him in.
 
Caracus2k said:
Here's one from November 2023

www.mirror.co.uk

Suella Braverman fails in bid to deport rapist who is ‘danger to the community’

After being jailed for five years and placed on the sex offender's register, the Upper Tribunal court allowed the now-freed man's appeal to remain in the UK on human rights grounds
www.mirror.co.uk www.mirror.co.uk
Click to expand...
This week the Upper Tribunal court, sitting in Central London, allowed his appeal on human rights grounds, saying “very compelling circumstances... outweigh the public interest”.
Click to expand...

Oh great, maybe more people could get raped if he has a "sexual emergency", but as long as he's not sent home, that's fine.

Clown world.
 
Last edited:
D.P. said:
It is deliberate because it causes headlines like x million spent on asylum seekers hotel bills. The Tories believe this will directly lead to voted because, well sending 100 people to rawanda while breaking many international laws will have such a profound impact.

The immigration and small problem is easily solved, but if they solve that the. they have nothing to scare voters.
Click to expand...

Are you blind?
Are you deaf?
Are you a Guardian reader?
Are you not concerned at the £8m a day bill for hotels?
Are you not bothered that potential rapist, pedophiles, terrorist etc have gone missing in the UK?
Are you interested in living in Sweden?
Finally: Are you ******* ******
 
8 million per day for hotels as of Sept 23, likely 10 million a day now or 3.65 billion per year paid by us, not the government, our money. Nobody asked me because they know i'd say do one.

That's just hotels, never mind private rented houses, clothes, phones, pocket money, medical, dental, interpetors etc etc. The bill is phenomenal and for what? Where is the published plan? Hotel life forever?

And why are the overwhelming majority of them young men? Men fleeing war and persecution take their families with them. Men going to war leave their families behind.
 
aVdub said:
Are you blind?
Are you deaf?
Are you a Guardian reader?
Are you not concerned at the £8m a day bill for hotels?
Are you not bothered that potential rapist, pedophiles, terrorist etc have gone missing in the UK?
Are you interested in living in Sweden?
Finally: Are you ******* ******
Click to expand...
This Is what the Tories want you to think, so sad you fall for their propaganda.

These issues either simply do not exist except in your head, or are easily and economically solved.
 
D.P. said:
This Is what the Tories want you to think, so sad you fall for their propaganda.

These issues either simply do not exist except in your head, or are easily and economically solved.
Click to expand...

Obviously I will have to add you to that Ignore list as you are showing all the warnings signs of being a wet sponge.

Before I add you, I would like to remind you of labours market flooding in the early 2000's that allowed them to control the minimum wage, and how these current boat numbers would suit labour once again.

Apologies Mods and all if I went off topic.
 
Last edited:
D.P. said:
And all easily saved once the Tories are voted out and proper investments are made. The tories want you you to be shouting these figures at the top of your voice, this is their entire election strategy
Click to expand...

The immigration explosion started in 1997 under new labour and hasn't faltered. It matters not a jot which of the two parties are in power, this is not going away, all this Rwanda nonsense is mere chaff to distract. The same thing is happening in all of western europe all at the same time. One might say in lockstep.
 
D.P. said:
And all easily saved once the Tories are voted out and proper investments are made. The tories want you you to be shouting these figures at the top of your voice, this is their entire election strategy
Click to expand...

I suspect DP will still be blamming the 'tories' with his last breathe even if he was to meet a sticky end at the hands of the sort of people he advocates for.

About the only thing he's right about is that in the UK's particular case that 'asylum seekers' are only a smaller part of the problem, numerically speaking.

But the external migration Europe has seen in recent decades has been nothing but a disaster.

www.theguardian.com

Sweden reports record number of monthly fatal shootings

September brings 11 deaths as country rocked by wave of violence, much of it suspected to be linked to split within criminal gang
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Of course you can find similar reports for sexual offending aswell

And the stats don't lie about the financial contribution of non EU migrants either. With regularity across countries they show that most of these migrants represent significant net losses to the European societies they have moved into.

The exceptions are generally where you would expect them to be...
 
Last edited:
aVdub said:
Obviously I will have to add you to that Ignore list as you are showing all the warnings signs of being a wet sponge melt (Rob taught me that word)

Before I add you, I would like to remind you of labours market flooding in the early 2000's that allowed them to control the minimum wage, and how these current boat numbers would suit labour once again.

Apologies Mods and all if I went off topic.
Click to expand...

There is zero impact of immigration on minimum wage , this is decided by the government. In general, immigration increases average wages as GDP increases but differences are small. This is because labour demand is dynamic and salaries reflect micro and macro economics. This is why the as the UK population grew from 10millions tp 70 million we don't have 60million unemployed people, and average wages are far higher than 100 years ago despite a far hugh population and immigration rate..


This is basic economics.
 
D.P. said:
Average wages are far higher than 100 years ago despite a far hugh population and immigration rate..
Click to expand...
This is interesting, show me that purchasing power adjusted data :) most of us are all docklands workers still - just behind a computer screen, for a disgusting wage (office worker on an average London salary cannot afford to live alone, its worse than docklands workers in the early XX century). Both me and my wife are 1 percenters and still can barely afford a house in a nice area. 50 years ago we would have owned 4000sqm Victorian mansion(by earning top 1% then, not earning nominal value today obviously) without breaking a sweat.

This is not basic economy, not when most of those wages from immigrants are going back to their home country.
You are using basic economy, so you know the relationship between supply and demand, yet you seem to ignore its effect on wages :D
 
Last edited:
CapitalOne said:
Ahem……there is an immigration thread you know. How’s this Braverman style barking going to help catch the fugitive?

Oh….bingo!
Click to expand...

He was caught on camera at Kings Cross not long ago, seen boarding the Victoria line. What are the BTP doing? If all the cctv in London, the MET, and all the other super duper security services can't catch him, i highly doubt comments on an OCUK thread are going to hinder the search.
 
aVdub said:
Are you blind?
Are you deaf?
Are you a Guardian reader?
Are you not concerned at the £8m a day bill for hotels?
Are you not bothered that potential rapist, pedophiles, terrorist etc have gone missing in the UK?
Are you interested in living in Sweden?
Finally: Are you ******* ******
Click to expand...

I think he lives in Switzerland anyway and just reads the Guardian.

We don't actually know how many people are in the UK and it's quite possible that there are a few million more than the official population figures claim.

We don't do a good job of deporting the failed asylum applicants and we accept the majority of applicants anyway... something is going very wrong when France is rejecting >70% and we're accepting >70%... that suggests that they're finding reasons to reject at least half of those we'd accept.... and that's on top of the ones we have rejected who just opt to stay on anyway in the shadow economy and also those illegals who never even bothered to apply for asylum but will also just stay and work here illegally.

But D.P. will pop in with some dumb talking point about immigrants being great when he really means some group of legal immigrants including both French Bankers and successful asylum seekers can be said to be a net positive... but that's because of the French bankers and similarly highly skilled people etc.. it's got naff all to do with say the successful asylum seeker who ends up working as a cleaner and doesn't even include the failed applicants and illegals who end up as say kebab shop workers or nightclub toilet attendants "no splash, no gash"... we can't even account for them all, don't know how many there are and we're really bad at sending them back.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom