Don
Batteries run out in a month or two, but other than that they could sit there for years and still get the data off the disks I would have thought - assuming they weren't damaged in the crash.
'Contact lost' with Malaysia Airlines plane
- Thread starter Domo
- Start date
I don't subscribe to that thinking as in 48 years of life 99.999% of the time what we suspect happened did, the internet is often guilty of reversing that. My view is something went wrong and it crashed, the interest for me is what exactly, human or mechanical or both.
Yup.
dont think they'll be able to pinpoint to the area of the plane from a single debris.
if they find multi debris from all of the places, they'll be able to pinpoint to the area better from current simulation software.
regardless what i think, i really hope they find the black box
if they find multi debris from all of the places, they'll be able to pinpoint to the area better from current simulation software.
regardless what i think, i really hope they find the black box
Yeah I can imagine they will run some kind of simulation for ocean currents since the time of the disappearance, can't imagine it will give a massively accurate area but it's a start. Be interested to know the search area from this against the original search areas
Associate
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2014
- Posts
- 1,767
Will this spur on the search now? Were they thinking about cancelling it recently?
I still reckon it was hijacked and an attempt made to fly it to Iran for whatever reason (theres a few "possible" connections*) and it went down somewhere in a line between India and Madagascar - in almost any other direction including to an extent the area they are searching it would far more likely have been picked up by military radar, etc. due to the situations in those areas i.e. overland India, South China Seas, etc. are all heavily monitored as are most areas around west and north west Australia.
* None the least around that time an Iranian naval support fleet left Salalah unexpectedly and headed in that general direction.
* None the least around that time an Iranian naval support fleet left Salalah unexpectedly and headed in that general direction.
Last edited:
![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}
^^ Guess you did a little googling hence the edit :S
Not saying there is anything to it but there are several potential links that atleast publicly don't seem to have really been followed up on - a group with (potentially sensitive) links through work (fairly tenuous at best) as well as the 2 that boarded with false documentation.
EDIT: The possibility for it being in that position (despite possible based on distance and time) was discounted due to the assumption that if it was that side of the satellite it would have come into range of another Inmarsat satellite but since some possibilities have come up as to why it might not have been picked up by other satellites.
Not saying there is anything to it but there are several potential links that atleast publicly don't seem to have really been followed up on - a group with (potentially sensitive) links through work (fairly tenuous at best) as well as the 2 that boarded with false documentation.
EDIT: The possibility for it being in that position (despite possible based on distance and time) was discounted due to the assumption that if it was that side of the satellite it would have come into range of another Inmarsat satellite but since some possibilities have come up as to why it might not have been picked up by other satellites.
Last edited:
Yea, but it most probably just crashed. They never landed on the moon, they never crashed planes into the twin towers and there were bombs everywhere and there is evidence to this effect, well apart from the fact they did land on the moon and did crash some planes into the twin towers as we all believe because there is MASSIVE evidence to prove it.
Using Google and pulling together elements of data to fit a story is the heart of how CT's work, it is their reason for being. They can make some really compelling arguments too when they add in some made up stuff and conjecture but reality is most are fantasists who make stuff up or more often ignore the 99.9999% of evidence that does lead to what really happened.
This one, funnily I am more open minded on actually, but CT's just NEED to see something else and frankly it's why most of the time they are proved to be mentals.
Well the difference is I'm not convinced it is the actual and only possibility - but I find with time that the possibility comes slightly more likely rather than diminished as other possibilities are increasingly coming up empty while for some reason it has largely not been tested and there are enough even if tentative at best links to merit some consideration.
Well we now have a broken bit of plane washed up on a beach and the likelihood that a plane crashed in a massive ocean and was therefore difficult to track is never less likely as time passes in my book, not least now we have a bit of it. Planes have vanished many many many times over the years, sometimes never to be seen of or heard of again, sometimes to be found in seas, swamps, rivers or ice and mountains. As I said this is still highly likely what happened here, but this one is more intriguing because of how it happened, but I still think the end was some sea and a plane hitting it at several miles an hour.
Soldato
What
Soldato
Sorry if I've missed this somewhere, but how do you then account for the location of the plane as determined by the satellite pings?
Associate
Interesting thing I heard on the radio on my way back from work today, marine biologists will study the barnacles to see their age and species to see what time they could have formed and where, to hopefully track the parts.
Science is awesome
Science is awesome
I think it's more likely to have landed on Diego Garcia than Iran having anything to do with it. At least that would tally with the satellite ping. It's always fun to blame the bogeymen... In reality it almost certainly crashed into the water. Why did it do that and why does it appear to have made several distinct and purposeful changes in course before doing so is the question that needs asking now.
It appears the crash investigators are going to be looking at how the flaperon came off as well to get a better idea of whether it came off in mid air, due to a soft/controlled landing or due to striking the water at full speed. That is going to be a more interesting announcement than todays I think, it will tel us a lot more.
Last edited:
Soldato
Everyone loves a good story. Unfortunately real life more often than not isn't that exciting. Step in conspiracy theorists.
Man of Honour
I think this confirms it. Iran have hijacked the plane, landed it, turned the passengers into Muslims and integrated them into society. The plane's wings were removed, and they will use the cylinder to convert it into a nuclear missile, which they will fire at western infidels.
The wing piece in the ocean is merely misdirection to throw the authorities off the scent.
Checkmate Iran. Checkmate.
The wing piece in the ocean is merely misdirection to throw the authorities off the scent.
Checkmate Iran. Checkmate.