Is the Dell U2410 really that bad?
No, it's not - It's actually very good, and I wouldn't recommend someone doesn't buy it unless they are prepared to use a VA or TN panel instead, or spend more money to get something with corrective controls such as the NEC WUXI series which comes with Colorcomp to help correct noticeable uniformity issues.
However there are 2 issues I've learned on my travels that you should be aware of before you buy *ANY* IPS screen.
The first thing is that IPS screens use 2 transistors per pixel, which is one reason they are more expensive. They also tend to need a stronger back light which can also increase costs (The main difference with E-IPS is that it lets more light through, and so it needs a less expensive back light). The difference in construction does mean IPS screens have good viewing angles and much less colour shift, which is what a lot of people find annoying about TN panels. HOWEVER..
This means IPS screens are also twice as likely to suffer from dead pixels as TN panels - because there are twice the amount of transistors which can go wrong. This is further increased by the fact that, because IPS panels cost more to produce, the manufacturer (LG) are reluctant to get rid of panels which display problems, and so are likely to impose less strict standards than others do on cheap TN panels, where it costs less to get rid of problem screens. People really need to be aware of this, because they think IPS screens = quality. In reality all it really means is better viewing angles and colour stability, but they are likely to be lower in quality than some of the better TN panels in other areas.
So, when you buy an IPS panel, you are at MUCH greater risk of buying a screen with dead pixels. This becomes more of an issue as screens get bigger because the number of pixels increase too, and so does your chances of dead pixels. This is something I wasn't aware of before buying an IPS panel, and I bet most of you reading this didn't know that either.
The second thing you should be aware of, when buying an IPS screen, is that LG currently have significant problems producing larger IPS screens which are uniform in colour. Whatever is going wrong during the production process, it means a fair percentage of screens can suffer colour gradation issues. This is better known, to some, as the pink/green tint issue, but it can also be a blue tint, and really the pink is just too much red being present. This problem is predictable in that the tint usually runs diagonally from the bottom left to the top right and contains 2 shades - usually red at one side and green at the other, but sometimes blue. It can also run top to bottom and left to right, and may contain tint at only one side.. IE the top right may contain too much red (which shows as pink when viewed on a white background) but the bottom left may contain no tint at all. These are big clues it's related to whatever's happening when the panel is put together. It may well be related to pressure, which would mean when it's applied evenly you get a screen with no tint, but when too much pressure is applied at one corner you get a diagonal tint, when too much is applied at the side you get a left to right tint, and when too much is applied at the top you get a top to bottom tint.
You tend to notice uniformity issues like colour gradation tints on static plain colour backgrounds, particularly grey and white, which is what computer users look at all the time. Since LG's main business is Television panel production, not computers screens, and TV screens tend to have constantly moving images, TV owners are much less likely to notice even fairly significant uniformity problems, and so this isn't as bad of an issue as it is for screens intended for computer users.
What, I think, makes the problem worse on screens like the U2410 is that it has a very wide colour gamut. That means reds are more red, greens are more green etc. That's fine, but it also tends to mean any tint is more red or more green too. So, if the screen has any uniformity flaws, they tend to stand out more. So it's likely that screens with a standard gamut, whilst they'll still suffer from this issue, are likely to be less noticeable simply because the colours are less intense.
So my advice would be to be very cautious of IPS panels. Like I said, get the idea out of your head that they are better quality in all areas - They are not. They have better viewing angles, and better colour stability, but NOT better uniformity, and they have significantly MORE chance of dead pixels. If you have a choice get a screen with a more limited gamut, because that's likely to mean it's a bit harder to spot uniformity flaws like tint. If you have the money, get a screen which provides controls which can somewhat correct for LG's flawed panel making process. NEC monitors featuring Colorcomp are the cheapest I know of right now. Otherwise you are in a panel lottery where most screens have very good uniformity, some aren't so good, and some are awful.
Provided you can avoid a U2410 with dead pixels or noticeable uniformity issues they are good screens (as long as you're not bothered by the thick anti-glare coating). It just might take you a few attempts to get one which doesn't have either dead pixels or tint, and Dell officially won't swap for tint issues because they know that a significant percentage of screens suffer from the issue. This is the one big mark against them, and why it may be better to look elsewhere.
The "leaked" A01 firmware from Dell China works for solving the dither in sRGB/Adobe mode btw, so (if you're prepared to flash it yourself - which is a very simple process) you don't need to worry whether you get an A00 or A01 now. However "officially" Dell will void your warranty if you flash your own screen, so don't go telling Dell if you do flashed your own screen. Since they sent out many screens marked A00, which are in fact A01, there's no easy way for them to know unless you tell them.
Hopefully this helps some of your choices - The real problem isn't about Dell screens here - Dell don't even make the U2410, Innolux (who are owned by Foxconn) are the people who actually make the U2410. the problem is with IPS panels, and LG's utter disregard for quality control on screens intended for computer usage - which should have different standards applied than TV's.