• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

DLSS Momentum Continues: 50 Released and Upcoming DLSS 3 Games, Over 250 DLSS Games and Creative Apps Available Now

syks said:
Not 100% sure how to do that, so will prob just wait for the game ready driver
Click to expand...
Driver doesn't swap/update .DLSS files, on a game by game basis, it's either left 'as is' with the version of DLSS used on release or patched to a newer DLSS version in a game update by the dev.

It's a simple copy paste job, download the version you.want from techpowerup, open game directory where the DLSS file is and swap them/overright the old one.

Or as Nexus18 said, get DLSS swapper and follow the steps.
 
Nexus18 said:
Check back a couple pages or Google for dlss swapper. It's extremely easy and no faff at all using that (tbh wasn't even an issue with just copying and pasting one file)
Click to expand...
Interesting that DLSS-Swapper doesnt seem to work on my machine. I've tried a couple of different version on the github release page - both install ok but neither load and show the UI. After a few seconds the process quits in Task Manager. Dunno what's going on there. DLSS is easy enough to update manually though, thankfully.
 
Trick said:
Interesting that DLSS-Swapper doesnt seem to work on my machine. I've tried a couple of different version on the github release page - both install ok but neither load and show the UI. After a few seconds the process quits in Task Manager. Dunno what's going on there. DLSS is easy enough to update manually though, thankfully.
Click to expand...
UAC blocking it maybe?
 
www.techpowerup.com

Immortals of Aveum: FSR 2.2 vs. DLSS 2 vs. DLSS 3 Comparison Review

Immortals of Aveum is out now on PC, with support for NVIDIA DLSS Super Resolution and Frame Generation. Also supported is AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution. In this mini-review we compare the image quality and performance gains offered by these technologies.
www.techpowerup.com www.techpowerup.com

In Immortals of Aveum, the FSR 2.2 implementation use a sharpening filter in the render path without the ability to tweak the sharpening values through a separate slider. The game is using a high sharpening value set by the developers, which might look slightly oversharpened in some sequences, especially at lower resolutions, however the sharpening filter does not cause any negative side effects or artifacts during gameplay. The TAA and DLSS implementations do not use any sharpening filters in the render path.

The in-game TAA solution has very poor rendering of small object detail—thin steel objects and power lines, incomplete and shimmery small particle effects, tree leaves, and vegetation in general. The TAA solution also has shimmering issues on the whole image, even when standing still, which are especially visible at lower resolutions such as 1080p. All of these issues are resolved when DLSS is enabled, due to a superior anti-aliasing solution. With DLSS you can expect an improved level of detail rendered in vegetation and tree leaves in comparison to the in-game TAA solution. Small details in the particle effects in different variety of magic abilities are rendered more stably, correctly and completely in all Quality modes.

The FSR 2.2 implementation comes with noticeable compromises in image quality—in favor of performance in most sequences of the game. Although FSR 2.2 does not cause excessive shimmering and flickering on vegetation, tree leaves and thin steel objects, as we've seen numerous times in games that we've previously tested, Immortals of Aveum has a lot of variety of magic abilities on screen and FSR 2.2 simply fails to properly reconstruct the details in these small particle effects. With FSR 2.2 enabled, almost all in-game magic abilities have an incomplete look with shimmering and small ghosting issues, especially visible in motion, compared to the native TAA solution and DLSS. The anti-aliasing quality is also inferior, as the overall image has more jagged lines in motion, especially visible on small particle effects during combat and in vegetation.

The NVIDIA DLSS Frame Generation implementation isn't perfect in this game, as it has a quite significant issues—extreme jittering and ghosting issues in on screen UI elements, such as the players crosshair, health bar and subtitles. Immortals of Aveum is a fast paced action game, so when using any temporal upscaling solutions, the temporal stability of the image is key to enjoyable gameplay, but during combat with such a large amount of ghosting and jittering issues in the DLSS Frame Generation image—it would be simply unusable for most players. It is disappointing to see, as this Unreal Engine 5.1 game is very demanding on the GPU and DLSS Frame Generation provides a very good performance boost across all resolutions in GPU limited scenarios. Also, you can't enable DLSS Frame Generation without enabling DLSS Super Resolution first, which is not an actual technical requirement.

Speaking of performance, compared to DLSS, FSR 2.2 has slightly smaller performance gains across all resolutions, while also producing more image quality issues compared to other available temporal upscaling techniques. Overall, the DLSS and FSR 2.2 performance uplift at 4K and 1440p is a great improvement to the game. With DLSS Super Resolution in Quality mode and DLSS Frame Generation enabled, you can expect more than doubled performance at 1440p and 4K, and during our testing we haven't spotted any issues with input latency.
Click to expand...

TPU might as well just use a template for these upscaling comparison articles now! That's me assuming they aren't already.... :D
 
Last edited:
Aegis said:
DLSS 3 FG is completely busted in this game - I'm amazed it was released in that state.
Click to expand...

Yeah sadly frame generation is a bit hit and miss. I wonder how much of it is down to the end user settings too as there is no clear guide on how to run it best e.g. a lot of people use low latency setting in nvcp and fps limiters with rivatuner/nvcp when apparently these cause issues and the only thing which should be turned on is vsync in nvcp along with reflex in game and no external fps caps.
 
Nexus18 said:
Yeah sadly frame generation is a bit hit and miss. I wonder how much of it is down to the end user settings too as there is no clear guide on how to run it best e.g. a lot of people use low latency setting in nvcp and fps limiters with rivatuner/nvcp when apparently these cause issues and the only thing which should be turned on is vsync in nvcp along with reflex in game and no external fps caps.
Click to expand...
Activating any kind of sync, be that is in game, NCP or via 3rd party software (eg. Riva Tuner), will introduce a huge lag with FG. Best to leave it off (which is sad, since v-sync adds a lot of... cinematic smoothness :) ).
 
No need to enable any sync in software if you have a G-Sync display tbh, probs even better if it's got an ultimate module too than just G-Sync compatible. Never had smoothness issues since going QD-OLED on the DW. So smooth, so slick.
 
Last edited:
mrk said:
No need to enable any sync in software if you have a G-Sync display tbh, probs even better if it's got an ultimate module too than just G-Sync compatible. Never had smoothness issues since going QD-OLED on the DW. So smooth, so slick.
Click to expand...

I still keep vsync on in nvcp as likes of blurbusters etc. all still recommend it.
 
RavenXXX2 said:
No dlss, shocked I am.

Click to expand...

Oh well.

Guess puredark will be happy to get so many 5$ pledges for dlss3 support.

Benchmarks in Starfield already show 7900xtx equal to 4080 in performance, nvm the 4090, imagine official benchmarks with DLSS and FG on.. AMD would have to hide under a bridge in shame, lol.

And FSR2 on by default. Yikes.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom