Do you agree, something massive is about to happen ?

AcidHell2 said:
Ha-Ha
1) video has been released, 2nd the hole is the right size + the sliced streetlamps on the flight path to the pentagon and a 10ton generator being clipped before impact. then you have the wreckage.

2) some office fires. Ha-HA please it got struck by huge chunks of wtc1+2 Numoures photos showing huge damage to several parts of the tower. And no it did not fall at free fall speeds. A small portion of it fell at free fall speeds. It also did not fall in a Controlled demo way. Combine that with no vidsual, sound or sismic readings for explosives.
3) hardly surprising, so much confusion and if you notice it was an overlayed image behind her, she was not there. She and other news reports also would have no idea which wtc was numbered which.

4)Steel in America is not temperature rated at all, full stop. Another conspiracy lie, that really makes them look thick.

5) molten aluminium from the plane and do you have any idea of teh energy released from such a massive building falling. You realise how much PE a building of that size holds.

6) says who. planes are relatively easy to fly.
Click to expand...

do you have a link, as i provided one for my earlier stuff
 
dmpoole said:
oh dear, has somebody made a mistake with their accounts or dual personality? -

lambda.jpg
Click to expand...


A mod has quite obviously changed my post, so I quote myself.

Very funny. Seriously.
 
steel certified ha-ha
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
UL did not certify any steel as suggested. In fact, in U.S. practice, steel is not certified at all; rather structural assemblies are tested for their fire resistance rating in accordance with a standard procedure such as ASTM E 119 (see NCSTAR 1-6B). That the steel was “certified ... to 2000 degrees Fahrenheit for six hours” is simply not true.
Click to expand...

Can you start to see how many lies are in these CT videos how much rubbish they sprout. How they use architects to talk about structural engineering and other people talking way outside there qualifications.
 
Why is the term 'conspiracy theory' so discredited when the official version of 9/11 events IS a conspiracy theory itself?

A bunch of Saudis with box cutters pulled off a massive terrorist attack. That is a conspiracy theory.
 
dirtydog said:
Why is the term 'conspiracy theory' so discredited when the official version of 9/11 events IS a conspiracy theory itself?
Click to expand...
why?
Because it is based on lies and miss truths. If it had solid reasonable backings it would be a theory. But that is not what these are.
 
I only picked a few points, i'm sure there are counter arguments debunking your reports etc

What about the supposed phone calls from 35,000 feet, mobile phones dont work above 2000 or so feet
 
stinka said:
I only picked a few points, i'm sure there are counter arguments debunking your reports etc
Click to expand...

How do you debunk that steel in America is not temperature tested? How do you get past that one? Why not accept you have been lied to and that you need to go do some serious research before trying to defend you position.

Phones do work, but are unreliable.
 
AcidHell2 said:
How do you debunk that steel in America is not temperature tested? How do you get past that one? Why not accept you have been lied to and that you need to go do some serious research before trying to defend you position.

Phones do work, but are unreliable.
Click to expand...

nah, theres no way the building would have collapsed like it did, with a section of weakened girders, i mean, into its own footprint, there'd be massive sections all over the place ffs, huge sections of multiple floors

squibs, explosions, people need to wake up
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom