This is funny, because presumably you think Trump is those things...
i will give you "wild" (depending on your definition and how it applies to Trump) and "determined to win" (win what though, in the context of being president?).
The others....Hilarious
Fearless - what?
less - easily foreign ruled - double what??!
Experience of leadership - He is a trust fund baby who has bullied his way through life because of the vast sums of money his father left him. He hasn't shown any real leadership qualities whatsover.
Getting Results - MEGA what. A history full of business failures, bankruptcies, fraud convictions and allegations.
You will do yourself and any partisans of yours, never mind the forum, better service if you apply the tougher test:
Assert there is absolutely no proof of each of the characteristics you discounted.
Then, rise to the status of at least a 16 yo student logician, as follows:
Treat each of your assertions as a proposal (proposition) whose truth or falsity is to be tested by honest inspection of the facts.
Set aside any attachment of emotion as you do so. A proposition is a statement that is to be tested, it is not a statement of premature belief or opinion.
Conclude on the consistency or inconsistency of each statement (proposition) you made by the following rule:
If the actual facts support (match) your negative stated proposition, that is, if both can be true at the same time, then declare for that proposition that your view is consistent with the facts. If not, declare your proposed view is inconsistent with the facts.
Rinse and repeat for each negative position you have tested.
Bear in mind you are presenting your results to at least one highly competent practising Logician.