Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 6,429
edited for yousorry for my sneaky edit, I added "supposedly".
Last edited:
edited for yousorry for my sneaky edit, I added "supposedly".
As I cannot see legally or morally wrong.
You're going to need to be the middle man for those of us without x accounts.Big chat story going on now " DR DISRESPECT EXPOSED " (HERE)
Well you seemed happy to base your opinion on X posts, thought that was the legal standing for you. Hence why I now asked for your opinion.I also see a completely anonymous email that includes legal threats to the people who outed Doc and pleas for people to forgive Doc
You're going to need to be the middle man for those of us without x accounts.
only catched the last 2mins and yer nasty words at endDidn't miss much for a BIG exposure chat...
Lots of nasty words being thrown at each other, then some odd minor rap at the end, some laughs and it's over
that same post/statement can and will be used agaisnt him in acourt of law implicating him self legally if its deemed relavant. so why implecate your/him self? becauce he's a super star and can get away with it? unlikely (its not working for Donald T or Gary G)I see a statement from Doc
I also see a completely anonymous email that includes legal threats to the people who outed Doc and pleas for people to forgive Doc
For someone who said the word evidence so many times with implication of it being legal evidence you're happy to jump a mile for obviously biased sources.
Well you seemed happy to base your opinion on X posts, thought that was the legal standing for you. Hence why I now asked for your opinion.
Also used numerous times in that post "if the email is true", are you sure you are reading these replies properly?
please dont take this personally. butthe two sources are obviously biased.
i do find it interesting we've had no statements from the family on the other side (the minors one) you'd think they'd be lining up to make ££ out of this with exclusives.
please dont take this personally. but
every source is biased
thats true i hadnt considered that.The minor might have reached an agreement also.
when a moment allows could you indicate to me which bit was the "odd legal threats" so i can re-examin it?, i was interpreting it as what the expected legal options there might be to respond to accusations, which isnt uncommon (a sort of example is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ok1_xVnRyPE were some one explains whats going on from a legal view on a case).the other is anonymous but making odd legal threats and pleas on Docs behalf
you are indeed entitled to your opinon and to share it, and i beleive we all respect it even if people dont agree with it, if we all had the same it would be a very boring world, and sadly we also need people that see the bad in the world to report it also. it is also (and i have dont this many times) easy to mis interprest some ones responces. i hope thats the case in this instance(S) in the thread.when someone asks my opinion.
when a moment allows could you indicate to me which bit was the "odd legal threats" so i can re-examin it?
There will be legal avenues explored on this one and it will likely ultimately manifest itself in a huge damages claim against twitch for this coming out. It's clear in the industry that they were absolutely raging when he re-appeared on Youtube and came back bigger than ever
This person would have largely been fine legally if he had not mentioned the word "sexting" - because it was all about damaging Dr Disrespect's reputation. But because they used that word - expect legal proceedings to get under way quickly
thank you.Odd words from an "anonymous ex-twitch employee" <- literally any words could have been used here, zero identity is proven even to a 3rd party like the second accuser to The Verge did.
at least it'll have more credability!At this rate I wouldn't be surprised to see my dead Labrador post a new update.
Anything for clout. These people dont give to f's about defending kids...they just want their social platforms to get views.Oh damn, World of Warcraft streamer now investigates the Doc.
At this rate I wouldn't be surprised to see my dead Labrador post a new update.
Anything for clout. These people dont give to f's about defending kids...they just want their social platforms to get views.
You can tell how disingenuous they are when they start coming out with 'well if you defend this your a pedo too'
Give me a break.
Didnt he put out a video basically stating he is done with the doc as its unacceptable?NickMerks being one of the worst, such as his tweet updates below