Is Dr Disrepect going to come back from this or is this the start of his cancellation?
its hard to say.
he had a choice to make if he stays on. change content audience if its targeted at the younger age, or stay as he his.
if he changes people will say they were right because he's trying to throw people off and trick people.
if he doesnt change it peopl will say its a honey pot trap.
he can stop streaming, and people will still say hes a threat.
i think his best course is to dow hat hes doing and not make changes and stay the HARD hard course thats going to be going on now.
to properly rsesolve this i think he'd need to pubish something like the wispers, but the original settlement may prevent that (see questions below).
as a
weapon the "he's a pedo" is an effective weapon at reputation destruction, turning the public on some one and causing all sorts of real life problems for people (not person PEOPLE ploral, now his family will be called in to question by people, employees targeted for working for him).
the people in this thread should think about how :
1) they would react to being called that
2) how would you defend your self? how do you prove it? because you have a GF or BF? how do you Prove it and have people believe you? <- this is whats the most effective part
3) watch as those around you turn on you, with suspion and mis trust, their "righteous" morals coming through and accusations and frostyness to people you've known decades
and the defence "i would know there age doesnt wash", properly think about those 3 questions when acusations are thrown about.
i always wonder int hese cases whats the actuall motives? who's benifiting or why.
rememebr this could happen to any one of you to, inocent or not. i cincerally hope it does not.
as for sexting it really could be as simple as a play on words such as "bigger is better". you as adults will or should know that has multiple meanings at face value. as well as whats said in text can be easily mis-interpreted by some one else. as evidenced i think multiple times in the thread alone let alone the general internet.
i do have to wonder what inappropriate speak and discussios people had / have growing up and forgotten about as children, from watching pornos under age to drugs murder and whatever else people dream up.
quiet frankly those people constantly calling foul also break the law(s) im willing to bet at least at some point in their lives, its so easy to do no? use a copy righted image here, there. downlaod that song from internet. dont pay a train fair. crack that program. dont pay a bill. steal. read an Ebook. or accept something known isnt legit.
Odd words from an "anonymous ex-twitch employee" <- literally any words could have been used here, zero identity is proven even to a 3rd party like the second accuser to The Verge did.
if it is an ex-twitch employee why would they not want to protect them selfs?
i am curious what you would suggest doing in this insance? were you want to get a message out but dont want to be identified. or not send an email at all?
given there is talk about contract seporation it sound like this individual has the same contract clause. revealing who they are would mean a lawsuit agaisnt them i would assume.
if this is legit then the person sending it feels strongley enough to try and do something about it. clearly knowing the legal ramifications if the information is tracked down to them.
im re-reading this and the originals text posted on the image -
https://x.com/PapaStanimus/status/1805642914317381894/photo/1
which has flat image file of what appears to be a proton email.
There will be legal avenues explored on this one and it will likely ultimately manifest itself in a huge damages claim against twitch for this coming out. It's clear in the industry that they were absolutely raging when he re-appeared on Youtube and came back bigger than ever
what was the settlement for and what were the terms of it? we dont know. typically these things are ment to be silent and non public, its now NOT at least in part.
i dont see this as an odd legal threat. i see it as explaining a business arrangement made by 2 parties & one party broke faith even if its ex-twitch employees now. those ex-twitch employee's would still have a legal agreement about disclosure thats not unusuall in any business.
weather it is true or not about the intentions at this point is irrelavent that was already settled as its a legal issue in this statement.
reputation damage alone is going cost a lot and a huge amount of years. this ist the sort of thing you walk away from even if you are inocent this type of damage continues for years and has lasting effects.
This person would have largely been fine legally if he had not mentioned the word "sexting" - because it was all about damaging Dr Disrespect's reputation. But because they used that word - expect legal proceedings to get under way quickly
i read this as explaining a legal process. a technical play of whats expected to happen and why. this isnt a threat but a course of action.
some one posted a message stating some one did something
they used the work "x"
becaue they used word "x" its Defamation
becuase its a reputation issue you would be expected to move on this quickly. ask any company thats had a data breach about reputation. look at the lastpass hack. you move quickly to damage control and streer the situation rather then let it control its self and go were it wants.
this Proton anonymous ex-twitch employee sounds like they have a good understanding of the legal process, its not one of your desk-bods this sounds like a middle manager type person. or some one that deals with contract. say an account manager.
