Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 6,417
exactlyJust another case of once people form their opinion there’s no going back, doesn’t matter what he says or shows people are convinced he’s a nonce and that’s that.
exactlyJust another case of once people form their opinion there’s no going back, doesn’t matter what he says or shows people are convinced he’s a nonce and that’s that.
i am assuming these arent your words but your just condensing and repeating what Dr D has said . al-a this post https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/t...tly-banned-from-twitch.18891695/post-37348769Here's the long and the short of it.
Twitch decided they wanted someone out of contract early. They didn't want to pay him off so they fabricated a sexting story and didn't even bother to fabricate a formal investigation. Twitch used out of context messages from his DMs to try to prove their case which got dismissed in court.
They wanted all this under NDA before and after the court case they lost, clearly to cover up what vile cretins they actually are by trying to ruin someone's reputation to save a few quid.
They got bent over in court, but kept the NDA, which ex employees decided to break who clearly weren't privvy to the outcome of the court case as they've repeated the same lies from before the case proved them to be lies.
They've now been publicly called out as the NDA is effectively void and can expect to lose all their assets in court shortly.
Oh dear.
That’s funny because only a few months ago people were taking everything Kody said as fact, even though Kody story also had massive gaping holes in it.Your taking a lot of what Doc says as fact,
The burden is to prove that he is guilty not innocent.the fact is he has provided no proof for anything
This isn't actually a fact, this is an assumption based on what he said. Technically the person could have been over 18.also admits to messaging someone who was under 18 but of legal consent from where they are from (16/17)
We should just ignore the opinion of small minded idiots and alway look to the facts of a situation.Just another case of once people form their opinion there’s no going back, doesn’t matter what he says or shows people are convinced he’s a nonce and that’s that, throw on top of that people don’t like him anyway and it’s a done deal.
It's been proven in court that they did. Wtf are you on about?Ahh you've gone full conspiracy nut theory I see.
'fabricated a sexting story'
LOL ok. I guess Doc's tweet admitting to inappropriately messaging a minor is just going to be ignored by you then?
How many times, he won his court case.it was more my point.
we'll not know, on a lot of it.
my second point really was i make em think what proof do they want to see? then ask them how is the proof real/fake and can the poof be proven. anything Dr D provides will forver be questionable
It's been proven in court that they did. Wtf are you on about?
He's now challenging his accusers to provide proof to the contrary in public because they've broken their own NDA. If they can't provide a judge with it, guess what, it ain't happening.
The guy named Cody is in hiding, he's legally screwed.
What. More. Do. You. Want?
That tweet was bait to incite the Twitch guys to further breach the NDA, so he can discuss fully what happened without prejudice.O rly? I've not been keeping up with whatever has been coming out of Dr. D's mouth the last day or two. Can you show me what was proven in court? Link to the court case documents?
Why did he post a tweet admitting to inappropriate messages with a minor?
That tweet was bait to incite the Twitch guys to further breach the NDA, so he can discuss fully what happened without prejudice.
They fell for it. Hook line and sinker.
The case was for Twitch severing a contract because someone allegedly sexted a minor on their platform by the way.
They lost the case. Because he didn't.
Inappropriate messages he clarified were about trash talking the industry, twitch and generally being crass.O rly? I've not been keeping up with whatever has been coming out of Dr. D's mouth the last day or two. Can you show me what was proven in court? Link to the court case documents?
Why did he post a tweet admitting to inappropriate messages with a minor?
Inappropriate messages he clarified were about trash talking the industry, twitch and generally being crass.
It's insane that people believe he could have sexted a minor and not only get away with it but also get paid by twitch.
Who are you by the way to demand access to court documents?
They didn't lose, they settled, there's a differenceThey lost the case. Because he didn't.
Yes I believe him than that random Cody guy that was trying to sell tickets for his band because he is a public persona that will be held accountable for his words.Ahh it's Mr Trump's No.1 fan. You like to troll a lot so I won't spend too long replying to you. But if someone is claiming they 'won' a court case then why would you not want to see the ruling? Does it not fit the narrative?
Of course he's now saying the innaprpriate messages are about something else, he's gone full U-turn to try and act like nothing happened even after admitting it. As if you can just blindly take what comes out of his mouth as gospel.
Here's the long and the short of it.
Twitch decided they wanted someone out of contract early. They didn't want to pay him off so they fabricated a sexting story and didn't even bother to fabricate a formal investigation. Twitch used out of context messages from his DMs to try to prove their case which got dismissed in court.
They wanted all this under NDA before and after the court case they lost, clearly to cover up what vile cretins they actually are by trying to ruin someone's reputation to save a few quid.
They got bent over in court, but kept the NDA, which ex employees decided to break who clearly weren't privvy to the outcome of the court case as they've repeated the same lies from before the case proved them to be lies.
They've now been publicly called out as the NDA is effectively void and can expect to lose all their assets in court shortly.
Oh dear.
I think all we have is Doc admitting messaging a minor inappropriately, which should be career ending tbh.Has there been any proof shown either way. I've not been following really but all I've seen are accusations, Dr Disrespect admitting to inappropriate behaviour with and minor in a tweet and now people suggesting it was a conspiracy and he only admitted it to trick the accuser etc.
So simply put do we have proof of all this or are we just talking Drs word for it? The only proof I've seen is him essentially additting guilt in that tweet
You people who are so ready to condemn this man despite all of that ^^^ just stop and think about how you would like to be treated if anything like this ever happened to you and you are innocent, there is a reason we in this society operate on the presumption of innocent until proven guilty.